Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427872›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sports science & medicine2019

Functional Vs. Running Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training: Effects on VO

Verena Menz, Natalie Marterer, Sachin B Amin, Martin Faulhaber, Alexander B Hansen, Justin S Lawley

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The neighbourhood built environment and health-related fitness: a narrative systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Efficacy ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Sustainability of Hiking in Combination with Coaching in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Quality of Life.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Verena MenzDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Natalie MartererDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sachin B AminDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin FaulhaberDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexander B HansenDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Justin S LawleyDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess if high-intensity interval training (HIIT) using functional exercises is as effective as traditional running HIIT in improving maximum oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

AdultCardiorespiratory FitnessFemaleHeart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPerceptionPhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionRunningYoung Adultbody compositioncalisthenicsFunctional trainingsprint interval trainingTabata protocol

Identifiers

PMID31427872
PMCPMC6683610
OpenAlexW2955931723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.