ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2019
Inertial Sensors in Swimming: Detection of Stroke Phases through 3D Wrist Trajectory.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of Multi-Sensor Measurement in the Assessment of Movement Quality: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Pooled it
- Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Wearable Sensor-Based Phase Segmentation Analysis of Front Crawl Swimming: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Onshore human swimming motion measurement and dynamic analysis using wearable inertial sensors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Assessing real-world movements using consumer-grade wearable devices: Measuring segment orientations and movement quality.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
- Paddle-to-Podium: a four-phased applied research model, translating research into practice for female surfers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Swimming Velocity Analysis Using Wearable Inertial Sensors and Speedometer: A Comparative Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of different warm-up methods on 50-meter breaststroke swimming performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Novel Method for Estimating Propulsive Force Generated by Swimmers' Hands Using Inertial Measurement Units and Pressure Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Integrated Timing of Stroking, Breathing, and Kicking in Front-Crawl Swimming: A Novel Stroke-by-Stroke Approach Using Wearable Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Portable and Flexible Self-Powered Multifunctional Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring in Swimming.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Arm-Stroke Descriptor Variability during 200-m Front Crawl Swimming.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring the upper arm propulsion is a crucial task for swimmer performance. The swimmer indeed can produce displacement of the body by modulating the upper limb kinematics. The present study proposes an approach for automatically recognize all stroke phases through three-dimensional (3D) wrist's trajectory estimated using inertial devices. Inertial data of 14 national-level male swimmer were collected while they performed 25 m front-crawl trial at intensity range from 75% to 100% of their 25 m maximal velocity. The 3D coordinates of the wrist were computed using the inertial sensors orientation and considering the kinematic chain of the upper arm biomechanical model. An algorithm that automatically estimates the duration of entry, pull, push, and recovery phases result from the 3D wrist's trajectory was tested using the bi-dimensional (2D) video-based systems as temporal reference system. A very large correlation (r = 0.87), low bias (0.8%), and reasonable Root Mean Square error (2.9%) for the stroke phases duration were observed using inertial devices versus 2D video-based system methods. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for each stroke phase duration were always lower than 7.7% of cycle duration. The mean values of entry, pull, push and recovery phases duration in percentage of the complete cycle detected using 3D wrist's trajectory using inertial devices were 34.7 (± 6.8)%, 22.4 (± 5.8)%, 14.2 (± 4.4)%, 28.4 (± 4.5)%. The swimmer's velocity and arm coordination model do not affect the performance of the algorithm in stroke phases detection. The 3D wrist trajectory can be used for an accurate and complete identification of the stroke phases in front crawl using inertial sensors. Results indicated the inertial sensor device technology as a viable option for swimming arm-stroke phase assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31427865PMC6683631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.