Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427865›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2019

Inertial Sensors in Swimming: Detection of Stroke Phases through 3D Wrist Trajectory.

Matteo Cortesi, Andrea Giovanardi, Giorgio Gatta, Anna L Mangia, Sandro Bartolomei, Silvia Fantozzi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matteo CortesiDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea GiovanardiSchool of Pharmacy, Biotechnology and Sport Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgio GattaDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna L MangiaHealth Sciences and Technologies, Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sandro BartolomeiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia FantozziDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the upper arm propulsion is a crucial task for swimmer performance. The swimmer indeed can produce displacement of the body by modulating the upper limb kinematics. The present study proposes an approach for automatically recognize all stroke phases through three-dimensional (3D) wrist's trajectory estimated using inertial devices. Inertial data of 14 national-level male swimmer were collected while they performed 25 m front-crawl trial at intensity range from 75% to 100% of their 25 m maximal velocity. The 3D coordinates of the wrist were computed using the inertial sensors orientation and considering the kinematic chain of the upper arm biomechanical model. An algorithm that automatically estimates the duration of entry, pull, push, and recovery phases result from the 3D wrist's trajectory was tested using the bi-dimensional (2D) video-based systems as temporal reference system. A very large correlation (r = 0.87), low bias (0.8%), and reasonable Root Mean Square error (2.9%) for the stroke phases duration were observed using inertial devices versus 2D video-based system methods. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for each stroke phase duration were always lower than 7.7% of cycle duration. The mean values of entry, pull, push and recovery phases duration in percentage of the complete cycle detected using 3D wrist's trajectory using inertial devices were 34.7 (± 6.8)%, 22.4 (± 5.8)%, 14.2 (± 4.4)%, 28.4 (± 4.5)%. The swimmer's velocity and arm coordination model do not affect the performance of the algorithm in stroke phases detection. The 3D wrist trajectory can be used for an accurate and complete identification of the stroke phases in front crawl using inertial sensors. Results indicated the inertial sensor device technology as a viable option for swimming arm-stroke phase assessment.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAlgorithmsArmBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMotor SkillsReproducibility of ResultsSwimmingTime and Motion StudiesVideo RecordingWearable Electronic DevicesWristYoung Adulthand kinematicinertial sensorSwimming propulsionswimming techniqueunderwater

Identifiers

PMID31427865
PMCPMC6683631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.