Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427760›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2020

The economic case for prevention of population vitamin D deficiency: a modelling study using data from England and Wales.

M Aguiar, L Andronis, M Pallan, W Högler, E Frew

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The evident and the hidden factors of vitamin D status in older people during COVID-19 pandemic.Nutrire : revista de Sociedade Brasileira de Alimentacao e Nutricao = journal of the Brazilian Society of Food and Nutrition · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

M AguiarInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
L AndronisInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
M PallanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
W HöglerDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, A-4040, Austria.
E FrewInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. e.frew@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-1158
University of Birmingham · GBJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D deficiency (VDD) affects the health and wellbeing of millions worldwide. In high latitude countries such as the United Kingdom (UK), severe complications disproportionally affect ethnic minority groups.

objectiveTo develop a decision-analytic model to estimate the cost effectiveness of population strategies to prevent VDD.

methodsAn individual-level simulation model was used to compare: (I) wheat flour fortification; (II) supplementation of at-risk groups; and (III) combined flour fortification and supplementation; with (IV) a 'no additional intervention' scenario, reflecting the current Vitamin D policy in the UK. We simulated the whole population over 90 years. Data from national nutrition surveys were used to estimate the risk of deficiency under the alternative scenarios. Costs incurred by the health care sector, the government, local authorities, and the general public were considered. Results were expressed as total cost and effect of each strategy, and as the cost per 'prevented case of VDD' and the 'cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)'.

resultsWheat flour fortification was cost saving as its costs were more than offset by the cost savings from preventing VDD. The combination of supplementation and fortification was cost effective (£9.5 per QALY gained). The model estimated that wheat flour fortification alone would result in 25% fewer cases of VDD, while the combined strategy would reduce the number of cases by a further 8%.

conclusionThere is a strong economic case for fortifying wheat flour with Vitamin D, alone or in combination with targeted vitamin D3 supplementation.

Indexed as

FlourFood, FortifiedTriticumVitamin DAdolescentAdultAgedChildCholecalciferolCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCholecalciferolVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID31427760
OpenAlexW2969901132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.