Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427666›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Humic Acid Fertilizer Improved Soil Properties and Soil Microbial Diversity of Continuous Cropping Peanut: A Three-Year Experiment.

Yan Li, Feng Fang, Jianlin Wei, Xiaobin Wu, Rongzong Cui, Guosheng Li, Fuli Zheng, Deshui Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 275 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan LiInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China. liyan1008@163.com.
Feng FangInstitute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.
Jianlin WeiInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.
Xiaobin WuShandong Rice Research Institute/Hydrobiology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.
Rongzong CuiInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.
Guosheng LiInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.
Fuli ZhengInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.
Deshui TanInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China. tandeshui@163.com.
Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although humic acid has been demonstrated to improve the quality of some soil types, the long-term effects of humic acid on soil under continuous cropping peanut are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the continuous effects of humic acid on the physicochemical properties, microbial diversity, and enzyme activities of soil under continuous cropping peanut. In this study, a three-year consecutive experiment of cropping peanut was conducted in the North China Plain. In addition to the equal nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium inputs, humic acid treatment was applied with inorganic fertilizers. Compared with control experiments, humic acid increased the yield and quality of continuous cropping peanut. To elucidate the mechanism of humic acid affecting the soil quality, various soil quality indicators were evaluated and compared in this study. It was found that humic acid increased soil nutrient contents, including the total soil nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, and organic matter contents, which exhibited the maximum effect in the third year. Meanwhile, the urease, sucrase, and phosphatase activities in the soil significantly increased after treated with humic acid, of which the maturity period increased most significantly. The same results were observed for three consecutive years. Microbial diversity varied considerably according to the high throughput sequencing analysis. Specifically, the number of bacteria decreased while that of fungi increased after humic acid treatment. The abundance of Firmicutes in bacteria, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota in fungi all increased, which have been reported as being beneficial to plant growth. In contrast, the abundance of Ascomycota in fungi was reduced, and most of the related genera identified are pathogenic to plants. In conclusion, humic acid improved the yield and quality of continuous cropping peanut because of improved physicochemical properties, enzymatic activities, and microbial diversity of soil, which is beneficial for alleviating the obstacles of continuous cropping peanut.

Indexed as

ArachisBiodiversityCrops, AgriculturalHumic SubstancesSoil MicrobiologyCrop ProductionEnzyme ActivationFertilizersFood QualityMetagenomicsMicrobiotaRhizosphereSoilFertilizersHumic SubstancesSoil

Identifiers

PMID31427666
PMCPMC6700118
OpenAlexW2969669855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.