Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427409›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2019

Owners' perception of acquiring infections through raw pet food: a comprehensive internet-based survey.

Johanna Anturaniemi, Stella Maria Barrouin-Melo, Sara Zaldivar-López, Hanna Sinkko, Anna Hielm-Björkman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Johanna AnturaniemiDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland johanna.anturaniemi@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-6254
Stella Maria Barrouin-MeloSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Sara Zaldivar-LópezGenomics and Animal Breeding Group, Department of Genetics, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-8999
Hanna SinkkoDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna Hielm-BjörkmanDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversity of Córdoba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been concerns related to the risk of bacterial contamination from raw pet food to humans, but research is still scarce. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to use a worldwide internet survey-based data to evaluate the impact of raw pet foods on human health from the owners' experience. From 16 475 households, 0.2 per cent (n=39) reported having had a transmission of pathogen from the raw pet food to a human family member during the time that raw feeding had been used in the household. Only in three of those households the same pathogen that was found in the human sample was analysed and confirmed also in the raw pet food (0.02 per cent of all data). Moreover, 0.1 per cent (n=24) reported suspecting that a disease could have been transmitted to a human from the pet food. Feeding salmon and turkey, using more than 50 per cent of the diet as raw foods and preparing the raw food in the same place and utensils as the family foods all had negative association with infections. Having 2 to 6 year-old children living in the household was associated with more infections, although adults were the most frequently infected.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimal FeedAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfectionsInternetMaleMiddle AgedOwnershipPerceptionRaw Foodsraw pet foodsurveyszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID31427409
PMCPMC6952838
OpenAlexW2969646991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.