Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427386›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

A high resolution A-to-I editing map in the mouse identifies editing events controlled by pre-mRNA splicing.

Konstantin Licht, Utkarsh Kapoor, Fabian Amman, Ernesto Picardi, David Martin, Prajakta Bajad, Michael F Jantsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Two codes of RNA editing by deamination in human diseases.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Konstantin Licht *Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1478-5008
Utkarsh Kapoor *Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9406-3074
Fabian AmmanCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8646-859X
Ernesto PicardiDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnologies, and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6549-0114
David MartinCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Prajakta BajadCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1406-4844
Michael F JantschCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1747-0853
Medical University of Vienna · ATInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies · ITUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 26882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-mRNA-splicing and adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA-editing occur mostly cotranscriptionally. During A-to-I editing, a genomically encoded adenosine is deaminated to inosine by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). Editing-competent stems are frequently formed between exons and introns. Consistently, studies using reporter assays have shown that splicing efficiency can affect editing levels. Here, we use Nascent-seq and identify ∼90,000 novel A-to-I editing events in the mouse brain transcriptome. Most novel sites are located in intronic regions. Unlike previously assumed, we show that both ADAR (ADAR1) and ADARB1 (ADAR2) can edit repeat elements and regular transcripts to the same extent. We find that inhibition of splicing primarily increases editing levels at hundreds of sites, suggesting that reduced splicing efficiency extends the exposure of intronic and exonic sequences to ADAR enzymes. Lack of splicing factors NOVA1 or NOVA2 changes global editing levels, demonstrating that alternative splicing factors can modulate RNA editing. Finally, we show that intron retention rates correlate with editing levels across different brain tissues. We therefore demonstrate that splicing efficiency is a major factor controlling tissue-specific differences in editing levels.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAdenosine DeaminaseAlternative SplicingAnimalsBrainChromosome MappingGene Expression ProfilingMiceOrgan SpecificityRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA PrecursorsSequence Analysis, RNATranscription, GeneticADAR1 protein, mouseADAR2 protein, mouseAdenosine DeaminaseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA Precursors

Identifiers

PMID31427386
PMCPMC6724681
OpenAlexW2969996790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.