Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427345›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of postcraniotomy pain (SUPS trial): protocol for a randomised double-blinded placebo controlled trial.

Ana Licina, Jeremy Russell, Andrew Silvers, Xin Jin, Jason Denny

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04169854 (Pre-emptive Topical Lidocaine 5% Plaster for Prevention of Post-craniotomy Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04169854 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pre-emptive Topical Lidocaine 5% Plaster for Prevention of Post-craniotomy Pain : a Protocol for a Randomized, Triple Blind, Placebo-controlled Trail

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsPostoperative Pain, LidocaineArmsLidocaine 5% patch, Placebo patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Postcraniotomy Headache: Etiologies and Treatments.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana LicinaAnaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia analicina@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8897-0156
Jeremy RussellNeurosurgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew SilversAnesthesia, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Xin JinNeurosurgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Jason DennyAnaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Austin Health · AUMonash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostcraniotomy pain protocols use opioids, which are considered suboptimal analgesia following this procedure. Multimodal analgesia components are sparse. Our null hypothesis states that sumatriptan is not different to placebo in addition to usual intravenous opioids, for the treatment of acute postcraniotomy pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective single-centre randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial comparing subcutaneous sumatriptan injection in the recovery area with placebo for the treatment of postcraniotomy pain. Eligible adult patients (18 years and older) undergoing craniotomy will be identified preoperatively. Both patient groups will receive a subcutaneous injection at a point where recovery-nursing staff would initiate the usual intravenous opioid analgesia as per standardised pain management protocol. In both groups, further pain management will be followed by the usual intravenous opioid administration. Primary outcome will consist of the difference in pain experienced by the two groups of patients in recovery area 60 min after the study drug administration. Postcraniotomy pain will be measured at regular intervals using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in recovery area. The minimal clinically important difference of 10 mm on the VAS between the two groups will be considered as statistically significant. We will include selected clinical and patient-reported outcomes as secondary endpoints. Univariate regression will be conducted on each one of the clinically plausible potential confounders. We will enrol a total 136 patients, with the study duration of 2 years. This trial will commence recruitment on the 1 July 2019. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial protocol has achieved approval by the Austin Health Research Committee, HREC/17/Austin/596. This trial was prospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on the 10/05/2018 with a unique trial identifier U1111-1209-9072 and registration Number ACTRN12618000793213P. Findings of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: U1111-1209-9072, ACTRN12618000793213P.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnalgesics, OpioidAustraliaClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCraniotomyDouble-Blind MethodHumansInjections, SubcutaneousPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSumatriptanVisual Analog ScaleAnalgesics, OpioidSumatriptananalgesiacraniotomypostoperative painsumatriptanVisual Analogue Scale

Identifiers

PMID31427345
PMCPMC6701595
OpenAlexW2969826405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.