Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427339›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) trial: protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a novel model of care for stroke survivors living in the community.

Ricky Mullis, Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc Aquino, Sarah Natalie Dawson, Vicki Johnson, Sue Jowett, Elizabeth Kreit, Jonathan Mant, IPCAS investigator team

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03353519 (Improving Primary Care After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03353519 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS): A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Model of Care for Stroke Survivors Living in the Community

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CambridgeRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,041ConditionsStrokeArmsPrimary care model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stroke: time to address cognition.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ricky MullisGeneral Practice and Primary Care Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK r.mullis@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc AquinoGeneral Practice and Primary Care Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah Natalie DawsonMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK.
Vicki JohnsonLeicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth KreitGeneral Practice and Primary Care Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan MantGeneral Practice and Primary Care Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
IPCAS investigator team
Primary Health Care · QAMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health PTC-RP-PG-0213-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurvival after stroke is improving, leading to increased demand on primary care and community services to meet the long-term care needs of people living with stroke. No formal primary care-based holistic model of care with clinical trial evidence exists to support stroke survivors living in the community, and stroke survivors report that many of their needs are not being met. We have developed a multifactorial primary care model to address these longer term needs. We aim to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of this new model of primary care for stroke survivors compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) is a two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with general practice as the unit of randomisation. People on the stroke registers of general practices will be invited to participate. One arm will receive the IPCAS model of care including a structured review using a checklist; a self-management programme; enhanced communication pathways between primary care and specialist services; and direct point of contact for patients. The other arm will receive usual care. We aim to recruit 920 people with stroke registered with 46 general practices. The primary endpoint is two subscales (emotion and handicap) of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) as coprimary outcomes at 12 months (adjusted for baseline). Secondary outcomes include: SIS Short Form, EuroQol EQ-5D-5L, ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults, Southampton Stroke Self-management Questionnaire, Health Literacy Questionnaire and medication use. Cost-effectiveness of the new model will be determined in a within-trial economic evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Favourable ethical opinion was gained from Yorkshire and the Humber-Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee. Approval to start was given by the Health Research Authority prior to recruitment of participants at any NHS site. Data will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Patient and public involvement helped develop the dissemination plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03353519.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisModels, TheoreticalNeeds AssessmentCommunity Health ServicesHumansPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeIPCASMLASprimary careself-managementstroke

Identifiers

PMID31427339
PMCPMC6701584
OpenAlexW2969245909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.