Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427326›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Study protocol for 'The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)': a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people.

Rebecca Band, Sean Ewings, Tara Cheetham-Blake, Jaimie Ellis, Katie Breheny, Ivaylo Vassilev, Mari Carmen Portillo, Lucy Yardley, Christian Blickem, Rebecca Kandiyali and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Understanding the Meaning of Loneliness and Social Engagement for the Workings of a Social Network Intervention Connecting People to Resources and Valued Activities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The association between social isolation and musculoskeletal health in older community-dwelling adults: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebecca BandPsychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5403-1708
Sean EwingsHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tara Cheetham-BlakeHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jaimie EllisHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Katie BrehenyPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ivaylo VassilevHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mari Carmen PortilloHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lucy YardleyAcademic Unit of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Christian BlickemPublic Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Rebecca KandiyaliCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.
David CullifordNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK.
Anne RogersHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PHR/16/08/41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLoneliness and social isolation have been identified as significant public health concerns, but improving relationships and increasing social participation may improve health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of the Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS) study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided social network intervention within a community setting among individuals experiencing loneliness and isolation and to understand implementation of Generating Engagement in Network Involvement (Genie) in the context of different organisations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PALS trial will be a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial comparing participants receiving the Genie intervention to a wait-list control group. Eligible participants will be recruited from organisations working within a community setting: any adult identified as socially isolated or at-risk of loneliness and living in the community will be eligible. Genie will be delivered by trained facilitators recruited from community organisations. The primary outcome will be the difference in the SF-12 Mental Health composite scale score at 6-month follow-up between the intervention and control group using a mixed effects model (accounting for clustering within facilitators and organisation). Secondary outcomes will be loneliness, social isolation, well-being, physical health and engagement with new activities. The economic evaluation will use a cost-utility approach, and adopt a public sector perspective to include health-related resource use and costs incurred by other public services. Exploratory analysis will use a societal perspective, and explore broader measures of benefit (capability well-being). A qualitative process evaluation will explore organisational and environmental arrangements, as well as stakeholder and participant experiences of the study to understand the factors likely to influence future sustainability, implementation and scalability of using a social network intervention within this context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received NHS ethical approval (REC reference: 18/SC/0245). The findings from PALS will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and workshops in collaboration with our community partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19193075.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial IsolationSocial NetworkingSocial ParticipationSocial SupportCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PromotionHealth StatusHumansMental HealthPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomWaiting Listslonelinessprotocolrandomised controlled trialsocial isolationsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID31427326
PMCPMC6701612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.