Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427318›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adolescents: model development and illustration using two exemplar interventions.

Vijay S Gc, Marc Suhrcke, Andrew J Atkin, Esther van Sluijs, David Turner

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Willingness to pay for measures to increase use of active school transport.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijay S GcCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK vijay.gc@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-2605
Marc SuhrckeCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Andrew J AtkinFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Esther van SluijsMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
David TurnerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
University of East Anglia · GBLuxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research · LUUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health PR-R5-0213-25001Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/7Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust MR/K023187/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a model to assess the long-term costs and health outcomes of physical activity interventions targeting adolescents.

designA Markov cohort simulation model was constructed with the intention of being capable of estimating long-term costs and health impacts of changes in activity levels during adolescence. The model parameters were informed by published literature and the analysis took a National Health Service perspective over a lifetime horizon. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

settingSchool and community.

participantsA hypothetical cohort of adolescents aged 16 years at baseline.

interventionsTwo exemplar school-based: a comparatively simple, after-school intervention and a more complex multicomponent intervention compared with usual care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as measured by cost per quality-adjusted life year gained.

resultsThe model gave plausible estimates of the long-term effect of changes in physical activity. The use of two exemplar interventions suggests that the model could potentially be used to evaluate a number of different physical activity interventions in adolescents. The key model driver was the degree to which intervention effects were maintained over time.

conclusionsThe model developed here has the potential to assess long-term value for money of physical activity interventions in adolescents. The two applications of the model indicate that complex interventions may not necessarily be the ones considered the most cost-effective when longer-term costs and consequences are taken into account.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationQuality of LifeSchoolsAdolescentCost-Benefit AnalysisExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsPrimary Health Carecost-effectivenesshealth economicsphysical activityyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID31427318
PMCPMC6701678
OpenAlexW2956126918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.