Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427281›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing Analysis of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Steven B Maron, Leah M Chase, Samantha Lomnicki, Sara Kochanny, Kelly L Moore, Smita S Joshi, Stacie Landron, Julie Johnson, Lesli A Kiedrowski, Rebecca J Nagy and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical utility and applicability of circulating tumor DNA testing in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Determinants of Survival with Combined HER2 and PD-1 Blockade in Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Steven B MaronMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Leah M ChaseThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Samantha LomnickiThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Sara KochannyThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Kelly L MooreThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Smita S JoshiThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-2855
Stacie LandronThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Julie JohnsonThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-6563-5101
Lesli A KiedrowskiDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-2005
Rebecca J NagyDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Richard B LanmanDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8122-4329
Seung Tae Kim
Jeeyun Lee
Daniel V T CatenacciThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. dcatenac@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARK W. LINGEN · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
PANGEA: Personalized Antibodies for GastroEsophageal Adenocarcinoma Pilot TrialK23CA178203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CATENACCI, DANIEL · 2014 to 2016
$507k
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160NCI NIH HHS K23 CA178203NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. Utilizing a 73-gene plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA-NGS) test, we sought to evaluate the role of ctDNA-NGS in guiding clinical decision-making in GEA. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe evaluated a large cohort (

resultsTreatment history, tumor site, and disease burden dictated tumor-DNA shedding and consequent ctDNA-NGS maximum somatic variant allele frequency. Patients with locally advanced disease having detectable ctDNA postoperatively experienced inferior median disease-free survival (

conclusionsctDNA-NGS characterized GEA molecular heterogeneity and rendered important prognostic and predictive information, complementary to tissue-NGS.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID31427281
PMCPMC6891164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.