ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Force-Dependent Facilitated Dissociation Can Generate Protein-DNA Catch Bonds.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observation of hidden dynamics underlying facilitated dissociation of proteins from DNA.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Dicentric chromosomes are resolved through breakage and repair at their centromeres.Chromosoma · 2024Article
- Is There a Need for a More Precise Description of Biomolecule Interactions to Understand Cell Function?Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Calculating the force-dependent unbinding rate of biological macromolecular bonds from force-ramp optical trapping assays.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular structures are continually subjected to forces, which may serve as mechanical signals for cells through their effects on biomolecule interaction kinetics. Typically, molecular complexes interact via "slip bonds," so applied forces accelerate off rates by reducing transition energy barriers. However, biomolecules with multiple dissociation pathways may have considerably more complicated force dependencies. This is the case for DNA-binding proteins that undergo "facilitated dissociation," in which competitor biomolecules from solution enhance molecular dissociation in a concentration-dependent manner. Using simulations and theory, we develop a generic model that shows that proteins undergoing facilitated dissociation can form an alternative type of molecular bond, known as a "catch bond," for which applied forces suppress protein dissociation. This occurs because the binding by protein competitors responsible for the facilitated dissociation pathway can be inhibited by applied forces. Within the model, we explore how the force dependence of dissociation is regulated by intrinsic factors, including molecular sensitivity to force and binding geometry and the extrinsic factor of competitor protein concentration. We find that catch bonds generically emerge when the force dependence of the facilitated unbinding pathway is stronger than that of the spontaneous unbinding pathway. The sharpness of the transition between slip- and catch-bond kinetics depends on the degree to which the protein bends its DNA substrate. This force-dependent kinetics is broadly regulated by the concentration of competitor biomolecules in solution. Thus, the observed catch bond is mechanistically distinct from other known physiological catch bonds because it requires an extrinsic factor-competitor proteins-rather than a specific intrinsic molecular structure. We hypothesize that this mechanism for regulating force-dependent protein dissociation may be used by cells to modulate protein exchange, regulate transcription, and facilitate diffusive search processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.