Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31426850›Full record

GuidelineScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019

New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based.

Christian Maschmann, Elisabeth Jeppesen, Monika Afzali Rubin, Charlotte Barfod

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of spine motion during prehospital extrication procedures in motorsport.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian MaschmannEmergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark. c.maschmann@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-3236
Elisabeth JeppesenNorwegian Trauma Registry, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Monika Afzali RubinCochrane Anesthesia & Cochrane Critical and Emergency Care Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte BarfodEmergency Medical Services Copenhagen, University Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Herlev Hospital · DKOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Sundhedsstyrelsen 4-1013-148/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury is a relatively rare injury in Denmark but may result in serious neurological consequences. For decades, prehospital spinal stabilisation with a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard has been considered to be the most appropriate procedure to prevent secondary spinal cord injuries during patient transportation. However, the procedure has been questioned in recent years, due to the lack of high-quality studies supporting its efficacy. A national interdisciplinary task force was therefore established to provide updated clinical guidelines on prehospital procedures for spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients in Denmark. The guidelines are based on a systematic review of the literature and grading of the evidence, in addition to a standardised consensus process.This process yielded five main recommendations:A strong recommendation against spinal stabilisation of patients with isolated penetrating trauma; a weak recommendation against the prehospital use of a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard for ABCDE-stable patients; and a weak recommendation for the use of a vacuum mattress for patient transportation. Finally, our group recommends the use of our clinical algorithm to ensure good clinical practice.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based Emergency MedicineAdultAlgorithmsDenmarkHumansImmobilizationMoving and Lifting PatientsOrthotic DevicesSpinal Cord InjuriesStretchersTriageWounds, PenetratingBlunt traumaGuidelineImmobilisationPenetrating traumaRigid cervical collarSpinal stabilisationSpineboardTraumaTraumatic spinal cord injuryVacuum mattress

Identifiers

PMID31426850
PMCPMC6700785
OpenAlexW2969342028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.