Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31426846›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2019

Decitabine assists umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in improving glucose homeostasis by modulating macrophage polarization in type 2 diabetic mice.

Jieqing Gao, Yu Cheng, Haojie Hao, Yaqi Yin, Jing Xue, Qi Zhang, Lin Li, Jiejie Liu, Zongyan Xie, Songyan Yu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advancements in diabetes research and stem cell therapy: a concise review.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jieqing GaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Yu ChengDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Haojie HaoDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medicine, School of Life Science, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yaqi YinDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Jing XueDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiejie LiuDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medicine, School of Life Science, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zongyan XieDepartment of Geriatrics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Songyan YuDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Bing LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Weidong HanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medicine, School of Life Science, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiming MuDepartment of Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China. muyiming@301hospital.com.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-3540
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChinese People's Liberation Army · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising therapy for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Mechanistic researches demonstrate that the anti-diabetic effect of MSCs is partially mediated by eliciting macrophages into an anti-inflammatory phenotype thus alleviating insulin resistance. However, single MSC infusion is insufficient to ameliorate sustained hyperglycemia or normalize blood glucose levels. In this study, we used decitabine (DAC), which is involved in the regulation of macrophage polarization, to test whether MSCs combined with decitabine can prolong and enhance the anti-diabetic effect in T2D mice.

methodsHigh-fat diet (HFD) and streptozocin (STZ) were given to induce T2D mouse model. Successfully induced T2D mice were randomly divided into four groups: T2D group, MSC group, DAC group, and MSC + DAC group. Blood glucose was monitored, and glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity were evaluated during the entire analysis period. Epididymal fat was extracted for analysis of macrophage phenotype and inflammation in adipose tissue. In vitro, we examined the effect of MSC + DAC on macrophage polarization in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and explore the possible mechanism.

resultsMSC infusion effectively improved insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis in T2D mice within 1 week, whereas combination therapy of MSCs + DAC extended the anti-diabetic effects of MSCs from 1 to 4 weeks (the end of the observation). Correspondingly, more M2 macrophages in adipose tissue were observed in the combination therapy group over the entire study period. In vitro, compared with the MSC group, MSCs combined with decitabine more effectively polarized M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages. Further analysis showed that the effect of MSC + DAC on macrophage polarization was largely abrogated by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) antagonist GW9662.

conclusionsOur data suggest that MSCs combined with decitabine can more effectively alleviate insulin resistance and prolong and enhance the anti-diabetic effect of MSCs in T2D mice in part by prompting M2 polarization in a PPARγ-dependent manner. Thus, decitabine may be an applicable addition to MSCs for diabetes therapy. UC-MSCs combined with decitabine activate the IL4R/STAT6/STAT3/PPARγ axis to further promote M2 macrophage polarization in adipose tissue, reduce inflammation, improve insulin sensitivity, and lead to better glucose metabolism and long-term hypoglycemic effects.

Indexed as

Macrophage ActivationAnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBlood GlucoseDecitabineDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diet, High-FatInflammationInsulinMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLUmbilical CordAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBlood GlucoseDecitabineInsulinDecitabineDiabetesInsulin resistanceMacrophage polarizationMesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31426846
PMCPMC6700792
OpenAlexW2968162782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.