Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31426835›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

A structured telephone-delivered intervention to reduce problem alcohol use (Ready2Change): study protocol for a parallel group randomised controlled trial.

Dan I Lubman, Jasmin Grigg, Victoria Manning, Kate Hall, Isabelle Volpe, Stephanie Dias, Amanda Baker, Petra K Staiger, John Reynolds, Anthony Harris and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dan I LubmanEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia. dan.lubman@monash.edu.
Jasmin GriggEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia.
Victoria ManningEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia.
Kate HallSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Isabelle VolpeTurning Point, Eastern Health, Richmond, Australia.
Stephanie DiasTurning Point, Eastern Health, Richmond, Australia.
Amanda BakerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Petra K StaigerSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
John ReynoldsFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Anthony HarrisCentre for Health Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Jonathan TylerTurning Point, Eastern Health, Richmond, Australia.
David BestDepartment of Law and Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1125026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent population surveys suggest around 20% of Australians meet diagnostic criteria for an alcohol use disorder. However, only a minority seek professional help due to individual and structural barriers, such as low health literacy, stigma, geography, service operating hours and wait lists. Telephone-delivered interventions are readily accessible and ideally placed to overcome these barriers. We will conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to examine the efficacy of a standalone, structured telephone-delivered intervention to reduce alcohol consumption, problem severity and related psychological distress among individuals with problem alcohol use. METHODS/

designThis is a single site, parallel group, two-arm superiority RCT. We will recruit 344 participants from across Australia with problem alcohol use. After completing a baseline assessment, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either the Ready2Change (R2C) intervention (n = 172, four to six sessions of structured telephone-delivered intervention, R2C self-help resource, guidelines for alcohol consumption and stress management pamphlets) or the control condition (n = 172, four phone check-ins < 5 min, guidelines for alcohol consumption and stress management pamphlets). Telephone follow-up assessments will occur at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-baseline. The primary outcome is the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score administered at 3 months post-baseline. Secondary outcomes include change in AUDIT score (6 and 12 months post-baseline), change in number of past-month heavy drinking days, psychological distress, health and wellbeing, quality of life, client treatment evaluation and cost effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first RCTs conducted internationally to examine the impact of a standalone, structured telephone-delivered intervention to address problem alcohol use and associated psychological morbidity. The proposed intervention is expected to contribute to the health and wellbeing of individuals who are otherwise unlikely to seek treatment through mainstream service models, to reduce the burden on specialist services and primary care providers and to provide an accessible and proportionate response, with resulting cost savings for the health system and broader community.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000828224 . Pre-registered on 16 May 2018.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelephoneAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansResearch DesignSample SizeSelf-Help GroupsAlcoholInterventionRandomised controlled trialSubstance use disorderTelephoneTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31426835
PMCPMC6701125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.