Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31426579›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review.

R Brian Woodbury, Scott Ketchum, Vanessa Y Hiratsuka, Paul Spicer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Extending Research Protections to Tribal Communities.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Brian WoodburySouthcentral Foundation Research Department, 4085 Tudor Centre Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA. rwoodbury@southcentralfoundation.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6187-4498
Scott KetchumUniversity of Oklahoma, 5 Partners Place, Stephenson Pkwy, Suite 4100, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Vanessa Y HiratsukaSouthcentral Foundation Research Department, 4085 Tudor Centre Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA.
Paul SpicerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, 5 Partners Place, 201 Stephenson Pkwy, Suite 4100, Norman, OK 73019, USA.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JUDITH A JAMES · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Trust and Mistrust in American Indian and Alaska Native CommunitiesRM1HG009042 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SPICER, PAUL G · 2016 to 2024
$8.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS 5RM1HG009042NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009042NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scoping review was conducted to assess the state of the literature on health-related participatory research involving American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Online databases were searched for relevant articles published between 1/1/2000 and 5/31/2017. 10,000+ data points relevant to community-level engagement in and regulation of research, community research capacity and cultural adaptation were extracted from 178 articles. Community engagement varied across study components: 136 (76%) articles reported community participation in research-related meetings and other events and 49 (27%) articles reported community involvement in initiation of research. 156 (88%) articles reported use of community-level tools to guide or regulate research. 93 (52%) articles reported that community members received research-related training. 147 (82%) articles described some type of cultural adaptation. Across all articles, data points on community engagement were not reported in 3061 (40%) out of 7740 cases. Findings suggest a need for increased community engagement in early stages of the research process and for reporting guidelines for participatory research involving American Indian and Alaska Native communities. There is also need to further existing research on the impact of different components of participatory research on process and outcome measures and to develop funding mechanisms that account for the time and resource intensive nature of participatory research.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealth StatusHumansAlaska nativeAmerican Indiancommunity engagementhealth researchparticipatory researchscoping review

Identifiers

PMID31426579
PMCPMC6719130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.