Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31425504›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Suitability and safety of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate as a folate source in infant formula: A randomized-controlled trial.

Barbara Troesch, Johann Demmelmair, Martina Gimpfl, Christina Hecht, Goran Lakovic, Robert Roehle, Ljilja Sipka, Branka Trisic, Milica Vusurovic, Rotraut Schoop and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02437721 (Suitability of an Infant Formula With L-5-Methyltetrahydrofolate for the Particular Nutritional Use in Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02437721 nacompletednot on this map

Suitability of an Infant Formula With L-5-Methyltetrahydrofolate for the Particular Nutritional Use in Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsordsm-firmenich Switzerland AGRan2015 to 2018Enrolled360ConditionsGrowth and DevelopmentArmsinfant formula containing folic acid, infant formula containing MTHF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [6Nutrients · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Barbara TroeschDSM Nutritional Products Ltd., Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Johann DemmelmairLMU -Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Dr von Hauner Children's Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Martina GimpflHiPP GmbH & Co. Vertrieb KG, Pfaffenhofen, Germany.
Christina HechtHiPP GmbH & Co. Vertrieb KG, Pfaffenhofen, Germany.
Goran LakovicClinical Hospital Center "Dr Dragiša Mišović-Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.
Robert RoehleCharité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ljilja SipkaClinical Hospital Center "Dr Dragiša Mišović-Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.
Branka TrisicHiPP Study Center, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milica VusurovicClinical Hospital Center "Dr Dragiša Mišović-Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.
Rotraut SchoopDSM Nutritional Products Ltd., Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Sznezana ZdjelarClinical Hospital Center "Dr Dragiša Mišović-Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.
Berthold KoletzkoLMU -Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Dr von Hauner Children's Hospital, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5345-7165
MEFOLIN Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate is the predominant folate form in human milk but is currently not approved as a folate source for infant and follow-on formula. We aimed to assess the suitability of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate as a folate source for infants. Growth and tolerance in healthy term infants fed formulae containing equimolar doses of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (10.4 μg/ 100 ml, n = 120, intervention group) or folic acid (10.0 μg/ 100 ml, n = 120, control group) was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled trial. A reference group of breastfed infants was followed. Both formulae were well accepted without differences in tolerance or occurrence of adverse events. The most common adverse events were common cold, poor weight gain or growth, rash, eczema, or dry skin and respiratory tract infection. Weight gain (the primary outcome) was equivalent in the two groups (95% CI -2.11; 1.68 g/d). In line with this, there was only a small difference in absolute body weight adjusted for birth weight and sex at visit 4 (95% CI -235; 135 g). Equivalence was also shown for gain in head circumference but not for recumbent length gain and increase in calorie intake. Given the nature of the test, this does not indicate an actual difference, and adjusted means at visit 4 were not significantly different for any of these parameters. Infants receiving formula containing L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate had lower mean plasma levels of unmetabolized folic acid (intervention: 0.73 nmol/L, control: 1.15 nmol/L, p<0.0001) and higher levels of red cell folate (intervention: 907.0 ±192.8 nmol/L, control: 839.4 ±142.4 nmol/L, p = 0.0095). We conclude that L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate is suitable for use in infant and follow-on formula, and there are no indications of untoward effects. Trial registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02437721).

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFolic AcidGenotypeGermanyHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Milk, HumanPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTetrahydrofolates5-methyltetrahydrofolateFolic AcidMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)MTHFR protein, humanTetrahydrofolates

Identifiers

PMID31425504
PMCPMC6699731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.