Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31425023›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020

Evaluation of MRI to Ultrasound Registration Methods for Brain Shift Correction: The CuRIOUS2018 Challenge.

Yiming Xiao, Hassan Rivaz, Matthieu Chabanas, Maryse Fortin, Ines Machado, Yangming Ou, Mattias P Heinrich, Julia A Schnabel, Xia Zhong, Andreas Maier and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BIFROST: A method for registering diverse imaging datasets of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Sensorless End-to-End Freehand 3-D Ultrasound Reconstruction With Physics-Guided Deep Learning.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. DDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ReMIND: The Brain Resection Multimodal Imaging Database.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Unsupervised deep learning registration model for multimodal brain images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. [Multiresolution discrete optimization registration method of ultrasound and magnetic resonance images based on key points].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
  18. Automatic rigid image Fusion of preoperative MR and intraoperative US acquired after craniotomy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yiming Xiao
Hassan Rivaz
Matthieu Chabanas
Maryse Fortin
Ines Machado
Yangming Ou
Mattias P Heinrich
Julia A Schnabel
Xia Zhong
Andreas Maier
Wolfgang Wein
Roozbeh Shams
Samuel Kadoury
David Drobny
Marc Modat
Ingerid Reinertsen

Funding

CIHRWellcome Trust 203148Wellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In brain tumor surgery, the quality and safety of the procedure can be impacted by intra-operative tissue deformation, called brain shift. Brain shift can move the surgical targets and other vital structures such as blood vessels, thus invalidating the pre-surgical plan. Intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) is a convenient and cost-effective imaging tool to track brain shift and tumor resection. Accurate image registration techniques that update pre-surgical MRI based on iUS are crucial but challenging. The MICCAI Challenge 2018 for Correction of Brain shift with Intra-Operative UltraSound (CuRIOUS2018) provided a public platform to benchmark MRI-iUS registration algorithms on newly released clinical datasets. In this work, we present the data, setup, evaluation, and results of CuRIOUS 2018, which received 6 fully automated algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms were first trained with the public RESECT database, and then ranked based on a test dataset of 10 additional cases with identical data curation and annotation protocols as the RESECT database. The article compares the results of all participating teams and discusses the insights gained from the challenge, as well as future work.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosurgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31425023
PMCPMC7611407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.