Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31424576›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2019

Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial.

B Garlipp, P Gibbs, G A Van Hazel, R Jeyarajah, R C G Martin, C J Bruns, H Lang, D M Manas, G M Ettorre, F Pardo and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06166511 (Evaluation of Laparoscopic Non Anatomical Liver Resection in Hepatic Pathology), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06166511 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Non Anatomical Liver Resection in Hepatic Pathology

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsLaparoscopic Liver ResectionArmsLaparoscopic liver resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recommendations for the management of yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multidisciplinary review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pure laparoscopic major liver resection after yttriumLangenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tailored Systemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 19 institutions in 9 countries.

B GarlippOtto-von-Guericke-University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
P GibbsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
G A Van HazelSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
R JeyarajahMethodist Richardson Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
R C G MartinDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
C J BrunsUniversity Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
H LangGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
D M ManasDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
G M EttorreOspedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
F PardoHepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
V DonckierJules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
C BenckertVivantes Klinikum Am Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
T M van GulikAcademic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D GoéréInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
M SchoenStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
J PratschkeCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
W O BechsteinDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
A M de la CuestaRadcon Hispania, Pamplona, Spain.
S AdeyemiStatsxperts Consulting Limited, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
J RickeDeutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany.
M SeidenstickerOtto-von-Guericke-University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEAcademic Medical Center · NLAzienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESFreeman Hospital · GBGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHemel Hempstead Hospital · GBInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinikum im Friedrichshain · DEMethodist Richardson Medical Center · USSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Louisville · USWestern Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary resection of initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) can prolong survival. The added value of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) to downsize lesions for resection is not known. This study evaluated the change in technical resectability of CRLM with the addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based chemotherapy.

methodsBaseline and follow-up hepatic imaging of patients who received modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (control arm) versus mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) plus SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIRT arm) in the phase III SIRFLOX trial were reviewed by three or five (of 14) expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons for resectability. Reviewers were blinded to one another, treatment assignment, extrahepatic disease status, and information on clinical and scanning time points. Technical resectability was defined as at least 60 per cent of reviewers (3 of 5, or 2 of 3) assessing a patient's liver metastases as surgically removable.

resultsSome 472 patients were evaluable (SIRT, 244; control, 228). There was no significant baseline difference in the proportion of technically resectable liver metastases between SIRT (29, 11·9 per cent) and control (25, 11·0 per cent) arms (P = 0·775). At follow-up, significantly more patients in both arms were deemed technically resectable compared with baseline: 159 of 472 (33·7 per cent) versus 54 of 472 (11·4 per cent) respectively (P = 0·001). More patients were resectable in the SIRT than in the control arm: 93 of 244 (38·1 per cent) versus 66 of 228 (28·9 per cent) respectively (P < 0·001).

conclusionAdding SIRT to chemotherapy may improve the resectability of unresectable CRLM.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31424576
PMCPMC6899564
OpenAlexW2969221532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.