Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31424555›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2020

Towards Precision Medicine in Psychosis: Benefits and Challenges of Multimodal Multicenter Studies-PSYSCAN: Translating Neuroimaging Findings From Research into Clinical Practice.

Stefania Tognin, Hendrika H van Hell, Kate Merritt, Inge Winter-van Rossum, Matthijs G Bossong, Matthew J Kempton, Gemma Modinos, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Andrea Mechelli, Paola Dazzan and 21 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Illness Phase as a Key Assessment and Intervention Window for Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Stefania TogninDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Hendrika H van HellDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Kate MerrittDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Inge Winter-van RossumDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Matthijs G BossongDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Matthew J KemptonDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Gemma ModinosDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Paolo Fusar-PoliDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrea MechelliDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Paola DazzanDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Arija MaatDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lieuwe de HaanDepartment Early Psychosis, Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benedicto Crespo-FacorroCIBERSAM, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Birte GlenthøjCentre for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR), Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Stephen M LawrieDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Colm McDonaldCentre for Neuroimaging & Cognitive Genomics (NICOG), NCBES Galway Neuroscience Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Oliver GruberSection for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Therese van AmelsvoortDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Celso ArangoDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, CIBERSAM, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Tilo KircherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Barnaby NelsonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Silvana GalderisiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Rodrigo BressanInterdisciplinary Lab for Clinical Neurosciences (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jun S KwonDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Mark WeiserDepartment of Psychiatry, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Romina MizrahiInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Gabriele SachsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anke MaatzDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
René KahnDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Phillip McGuireDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
PSYSCAN Consortium

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_11003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 2 decades, several neuroimaging studies investigated brain abnormalities associated with the early stages of psychosis in the hope that these could aid the prediction of onset and clinical outcome. Despite advancements in the field, neuroimaging has yet to deliver. This is in part explained by the use of univariate analytical techniques, small samples and lack of statistical power, lack of external validation of potential biomarkers, and lack of integration of nonimaging measures (eg, genetic, clinical, cognitive data). PSYSCAN is an international, longitudinal, multicenter study on the early stages of psychosis which uses machine learning techniques to analyze imaging, clinical, cognitive, and biological data with the aim of facilitating the prediction of psychosis onset and outcome. In this article, we provide an overview of the PSYSCAN protocol and we discuss benefits and methodological challenges of large multicenter studies that employ neuroimaging measures.

Indexed as

Machine LearningHumansLongitudinal StudiesMulticenter Studies as TopicNeuroimagingPrecision MedicinePsychotic DisordersResearch Designclinical high risk of psychosisfirst episode of psychosismachine learningMRIneuroimagingpredictionpsychosisPSYSCAN

Identifiers

PMID31424555
PMCPMC7043057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.