Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31424055›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

The Specific Choice of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Scheme Based on Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Density.

Yue Chen, Xingkang Jiang, Ranlu Liu, Zhihong Zhang, Fei Luo, Shiyong Qi, Yong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue ChenDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of TianJin Medical University, TianJin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Xingkang JiangDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of TianJin Medical University, TianJin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Ranlu LiuDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of TianJin Medical University, TianJin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Zhihong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of TianJin Medical University, TianJin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Fei LuoDepartment of Urology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Shiyong QiDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of TianJin Medical University, TianJin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Yong XuDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of TianJin Medical University, TianJin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy and saturation biopsy can improve the accuracy of prostate biopsy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is still the cornerstone for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, it is not clear whether it is necessary to perform the same TRUS-guided biopsy scheme for patients with different prostate specific antigen (PSA) or prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimal core number for specific suspected prostate cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 398 patients who underwent 12-core biopsy scheme, who were included in this retrospective analysis. The 12-core scheme incorporated a classic sextant scheme and 4-core biopsies from the base and middle regions bilaterally. The cancer detection rates of patients with different PSA or PSAD levels between the 12-core, sextant, 4-core, and 2-core biopsy were compared. RESULTS The differences in cancer detection rates between the 12-core biopsy scheme and the sextant biopsy scheme were significant in patients with PSA <20 ng/mL or PSAD <0.3. There were no differences in the cancer detection rates between the 12-core biopsy scheme and the 4-core biopsy scheme in patients with PSA ≤50 ng/mL or PSAD ≤1.0. There were significant differences between 12-core and 2-core scheme when PSA ≤70 ng/mL or PSAD ≤1.5. CONCLUSIONS We recommend that the 12-core biopsy should be used for patients with PSA <20 ng/mL or PSAD <0.3. The biopsy scheme in patients with PSA 20-50 ng/mL or PSAD 0.3-1.0 should be considered in combination with DRE and MRI. For patients with PSA >50 ng/mL or PSAD >1.0, we recommend 6-core or 4-core biopsy by comprehensively considering multiple factors. The 2-core biopsy is recommended for patients with PSA >70 ng/mL or PSAD >1.5.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleChinaHumansKallikreinsMaleMicroscopy, AcousticMiddle AgedProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31424055
PMCPMC6752102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.