Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423681›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2019

Geometric considerations support the double-displacement catalytic mechanism of l-asparaginase.

Jacek Lubkowski, Alexander Wlodawer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Duplicate entries in the Protein Data Bank: how to detect and handle them.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Towards a dependable data set of structures for L-asparaginase research.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Structural Aspects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacek LubkowskiMacromolecular Crystallography Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-6347
Alexander WlodawerMacromolecular Crystallography Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty crystal structures of the complexes of l-asparaginase with l-Asn, l-Asp, and succinic acid that are currently available in the Protein Data Bank, as well as 11 additional structures determined in the course of this project, were analyzed in order to establish the level of conservation of the geometric parameters describing interactions between the substrates and the active site of the enzymes. We found that such stereochemical relationships are highly conserved, regardless of the organism from which the enzyme was isolated, specific crystallization conditions, or the nature of the ligands. Analysis of the geometry of the interactions, including Bürgi-Dunitz and Flippin-Lodge angles, indicated that Thr12 (Escherichia coli asparaginase II numbering) is optimally placed to be the primary nucleophile in the most likely scenario utilizing a double-displacement mechanism, whereas catalysis through a single-displacement mechanism appears to be the least likely.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisAsparaginaseCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coliModels, MolecularProtein ConformationStereoisomerismAsparaginaseBürgi-Dunitz anglesdouble-displacementenzyme mechanismFlippin-Lodge anglessingle-displacement

Identifiers

PMID31423681
PMCPMC6740147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.