ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics: X2019
Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Infant Sepsis: A Multidisciplinary Team Supported by Human-Centered Design Methods.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Information displays for automated surveillance algorithms of in-hospital patient deterioration: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Patient Information Summarization in Clinical Settings: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Work system barriers and facilitators of a team health information technology.Applied ergonomics · 2023Article
- Design and Evaluation of an Intensive Care Unit Dashboard Built in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Managing multiple perspectives in the collaborative design process of a team health information technology.Applied ergonomics · 2023Article
- Requirements for a Bespoke Intensive Care Unit Dashboard in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Engaging clinicians early during the development of a graphical user display of an intelligent alerting system at the bedside.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Iterative heuristic design of temporal graphic displays with clinical domain experts.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Article
- Provider Preferences for Patient-Generated Health Data Displays in Pediatric Asthma: A Participatory Design Approach.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- A Perioperative Care Display for Understanding High Acuity Patients.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- User-Centered Clinical Display Design Issues for Inpatient Providers.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Impact of integrated graphical display on expert and novice diagnostic performance in critical care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Situation Awareness-Oriented Patient Monitoring with Visual Patient Technology: A Qualitative Review of the Primary Research.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Association of an Electronic Health Record Add-on App for Neonatal Bilirubin Management With Physician Efficiency and Care Quality.JAMA network open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review original user evaluations of patient information displays relevant to critical care and understand the impact of design frameworks and information presentation approaches on decision-making, efficiency, workload, and preferences of clinicians.
methodsWe included studies that evaluated information displays designed to support real-time care decisions in critical care or anesthesiology using simulated tasks. We searched PubMed and IEEExplore from 1/1/1990 to 6/30/2018. The search strategy was developed iteratively with calibration against known references. Inclusion screening was completed independently by two authors. Extraction of display features, design processes, and evaluation method was completed by one and verified by a second author.
resultsFifty-six manuscripts evaluating 32 critical care and 22 anesthesia displays were included. Primary outcome metrics included clinician accuracy and efficiency in recognizing, diagnosing, and treating problems. Implementing user-centered design (UCD) processes, especially iterative evaluation and redesign, resulted in positive impact in outcomes such as accuracy and efficiency. Innovative display approaches that led to improved human-system performance in critical care included: (1) improving the integration and organization of information, (2) improving the representation of trend information, and (3) implementing graphical approaches to make relationships between data visible.
conclusionOur review affirms the value of key principles of UCD. Improved information presentation can facilitate faster information interpretation and more accurate diagnoses and treatment. Improvements to information organization and support for rapid interpretation of time-based relationships between related quantitative data is warranted. Designers and developers are encouraged to involve users in formal iterative design and evaluation activities in the design of electronic health records (EHRs), clinical informatics applications, and clinical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.