Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423483›Full record

ReviewFood chemistry: X2019

Rocket science: A review of phytochemical & health-related research in

Luke Bell, Carol Wagstaff

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food chemistry: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Freeze-Dried Extracts ofPreventive nutrition and food science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of Secondary Metabolites inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. KyohMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Improvement of the Quality of Wild Rocket (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of Wild Rocket (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luke BellSchool of Agriculture, Policy & Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AP, UK.
Carol WagstaffDepartment of Food & Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rocket species (

Indexed as

ArugulaBrassicaceaeFlavonolsGlucosinolatesIsothiocyanatesRucola

Identifiers

PMID31423483
PMCPMC6690419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.