Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423482›Full record

ArticleConditioning medicine2018

Adaptive Plasticity in the Retina: Protection Against Acute Injury and Neurodegenerative Disease by Conditioning Stimuli.

Jeffrey M Gidday

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conditioning medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeffrey M GiddayDepartments of Ophthalmology, Physiology, and the Neuroscience Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112.

Funding

ENDOGENOUS NEUROPROTECTION IN GLAUCOMAR01EY018607 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GIDDAY, JEFFREY M · 2008 to 2018
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although both preclinical and clinical conditioning studies in heart and brain lead the field of conditioning medicine, investigations of retinal conditioning still number more than 100. In this brief review, we highlight findings to date from animal and cell culture models of conditioning that provide demonstrated protection in acute and chronic retinal injury and disease models. The multitude of stimuli used to condition the retina, the signaling mediators and pathways identified, and the injury- and disease-resilient phenotypes documented are discussed herein, along with our recommendations for the kinds of studies needed to continue to advance this promising field. In our view, the robust protection afforded by these adaptive epigenetic responses to conditioning stress provides significant incentives for both furthering our investment in bench research and underwriting clinical trials, so that the full potential of this therapy can be realized.

Identifiers

PMID31423482
PMCPMC6696944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.