Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423458›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2019

Health outcomes of online consumer health information: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis.

Pierre Pluye, Reem El Sherif, Vera Granikov, Quan Nha Hong, Isabelle Vedel, Maria Cristiane Barbosa Galvao, Francesca E Y Frati, Sophie Desroches, Carol Repchinsky, Benoît Rihoux and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Getting Connected to M-Health Technologies through a Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Consumer Health Information: A Narrative Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trust in COVID-19 public health information.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How access to online health information affects the dental hygiene client experience.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pierre PluyeDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.
Reem El SherifDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.
Vera GranikovDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.
Quan Nha HongDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2576-5750
Isabelle VedelDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.
Maria Cristiane Barbosa GalvaoDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto University of Sao Paulo Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo CEP 14049-900 Brazil.
Francesca E Y FratiSchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering McGill University 809 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal QC H3A 0C1 Canada.
Sophie DesrochesSchool of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences Laval University 2325, Rue de l'Université, Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada.
Carol RepchinskyCanadian Pharmacists Association 1785 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa ON K1G 3Y6 Canada.
Benoît RihouxCentre de Science Politique et de Politique Comparée Université Catholique de Louvain Place Montesquieu 1/L2.08.07, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348 Belgium.
France LégaréDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine Laval University 1050, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada.
Bernard BurnandInstitut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive Lausanne University Hospital Route de la Corniche 10, Lausanne CH-1010 Switzerland.
Mathieu BujoldDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.
Roland GradDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet has become the first source of consumer health information. Most theoretical and empirical studies are centered on information needs and seeking, rather than on information outcomes. This review's purpose is to explore and explain health outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information (OCHI) in primary care. A participatory systematic mixed studies review with a framework synthesis was undertaken. Starting from an initial conceptual framework, our specific objectives were to (a) identify types of OCHI outcomes in primary care, (b) identify factors associated with these outcomes, and (c) integrate these factors and outcomes into a comprehensive revised framework combining an information theory and a psychosocial theory of behavior. The results of 65 included studies were synthesized using a qualitative thematic data analysis. The themes derived from the literature underwent a harmonization process that produced a comprehensive typology of OCHI outcomes. The revised conceptual framework specifies four individual and one organizational level of OCHI outcomes, while including factors such as consumers' information needs and four interdependent contextual factors. It contributes to theoretical knowledge about OCHI health outcomes, and informs future research, information assessment methods, and tools to help consumers find and use health information.

Identifiers

PMID31423458
PMCPMC6686988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.