Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423314›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open respiratory research2019

Time to NIV and mortality in AECOPD hospital admissions: an observational study into real world insights from National COPD Audits.

Anita Jayadev, Robert Stone, Michael C Steiner, Viktoria McMillan, C Michael Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open respiratory research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita JayadevRespiratory Medicine, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6948-7353
Robert StoneTaunton and Musgrove NHS Trust, London, UK.
Michael C SteinerLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Unit, Institute for Lung Health, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-0614
Viktoria McMillanNational COPD audit Programme, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
C Michael RobertsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK.
Musgrove Park Hospital · GBNational Audit Office · GBNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre · GBPrincess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust · GBWexham Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Randomised control trial (RCT)-derived survival figures for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admissions managed with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) have not been replicated in UK clinical audits. Subsequent guidelines have emphasised the need for timely NIV application. Methods: Data from the 2008 and 2014 national chronic obstructive pulmonary disease audits was used to analyse the association between time to NIV and mortality. Results: 1032 patients received NIV in 2008, and 1612 in 2014. Overall mortality rates reduced between the audits from 24.9% in 2008 to 16.8% in 2014 but time to NIV lengthened. In 2014, 20.9% of patients received NIV within 60 min versus 24.9% in 2008 (p=0.001). The proportion of patients receiving NIV between 3 and 24 hours increased from 31.3% in 2008 to 39% in 2014 (p=0.001). Patients admitted with hypercapnic acidotic respiratory failure who received NIV within 3 hours had lower in-patient mortality than those who received NIV between 3 and 24 hours, 15.9% versus 18.4%, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.425), but acidotic patients receiving NIV >24 hours after admission had significantly higher mortality (28.9%, p=0.002). A second cohort admitted with hypercapnia but normal range pH, who developed later acidosis, had higher mortality (24.6%), compared with those acidotic on admission (18% p≤0.001) and an extremely high mortality when NIV was given >24 hours after admission (42.6%). Conclusion: Survival rates for those treated with NIV has improved between the two audits but remains lower than reported in RCTs. Patients who developed acidosis after admission and received NIV later in the hospital stay have even higher mortality and deserve further study and clinical attention.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationAcute DiseaseClinical AuditDisease ProgressionHumansPatient AdmissionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTime FactorsUnited Kingdomclinical epidemiologyCOPD epidemiologycopd exacerbationsnon-invasive ventilationtime to NIV

Identifiers

PMID31423314
PMCPMC6688668
OpenAlexW2966600665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.