Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423309›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019

Significance of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer: Pathological local invasion and microvessel invasion analysis.

Yoshiki Naito, Hiroto Ishikawa, Eiji Sadashima, Yoshinobu Okabe, Kenjiro Takahashi, Ryuichi Kawahara, Toru Hisaka, Masaru Fukahori, Tomoyuki Ushijima, Yusuke Ishida and 12 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic Significance of Microvascular Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiki NaitoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Hiroto IshikawaDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Eiji SadashimaLife Science Research Institute, Saga-ken Medical Center Koseikan, Saga 840-8571, Japan.
Yoshinobu OkabeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Kenjiro TakahashiDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Ryuichi KawaharaDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Toru HisakaDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Masaru FukahoriDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Tomoyuki UshijimaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Yusuke IshidaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Masahiko TanigawaDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Yutaro MiharaDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Masamichi NakayamaDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Reiichiro KondoDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Hironori KusanoDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Yorihiko TakaseDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Hideyuki AbeDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Etsuyo OgoDepartment of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Koji OkudaDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Kazuhide ShimamatsuDepartment of Pathology, Omuta City Hospital, Omuta, Fukuoka 836-8567, Japan.
Hirohisa YanoDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Jun AkibaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Kurume University · JPKurume University Hospital · JPOmuta hospital · JPSaga-Ken Medical Centre Koseikan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer (BR-PHC) has low resectability due to vascular invasion. Although the clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC-RT) for BR-PHC have been examined, few studies have reported its pathological aspects. The present study retrospectively investigated the effect of NAC-RT on the histological features of BR-PHC. A total of 29 patients with BR-PHC who underwent NAC-RT, and 55 controls with resectable PHC, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Kurume University Hospital. Tumor staging, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and microvessel invasion (MVI) were evaluated. The median tumor size in the NAC-RT group was 2.0 cm, and it was smaller than that of the control group (P=0.006). The rates of lymph node metastasis, LVI, and MVI were significantly lower in the NAC-RT group (P<0.001, 0.002, and 0.015, respectively). Overall survival in the NAC-RT group was comparable to that in the control group, although patients with BR-PHC generally had a poorer prognosis than those with resectable PHC. Patients in the NAC-RT group without portal vein invasion (PVI) had a significantly better prognosis than those with PVI in the control group (P=0.002). NAC-RT may be beneficial for patients with BR-PHC by inhibiting local invasion and metastasis as prognosis following resection could be equivalent to that of patients with conventional ductal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

microvessel invasionneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapypancreaspancreatic head cancerportal vein invasion

Identifiers

PMID31423309
PMCPMC6688216
OpenAlexW2953142375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.