ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019
Significance of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer: Pathological local invasion and microvessel invasion analysis.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Significance of Microvascular Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of microvasculature invasion subtype (MVI vs. LVI) and associated risk factors on survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer after curative surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Association Between Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pathological Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer Patients After Resection: Prognostic Significance of Microscopic Venous Invasion.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Development, Validation and Comparison of Artificial Neural Network Models and Logistic Regression Models Predicting Survival of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer (BR-PHC) has low resectability due to vascular invasion. Although the clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC-RT) for BR-PHC have been examined, few studies have reported its pathological aspects. The present study retrospectively investigated the effect of NAC-RT on the histological features of BR-PHC. A total of 29 patients with BR-PHC who underwent NAC-RT, and 55 controls with resectable PHC, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Kurume University Hospital. Tumor staging, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and microvessel invasion (MVI) were evaluated. The median tumor size in the NAC-RT group was 2.0 cm, and it was smaller than that of the control group (P=0.006). The rates of lymph node metastasis, LVI, and MVI were significantly lower in the NAC-RT group (P<0.001, 0.002, and 0.015, respectively). Overall survival in the NAC-RT group was comparable to that in the control group, although patients with BR-PHC generally had a poorer prognosis than those with resectable PHC. Patients in the NAC-RT group without portal vein invasion (PVI) had a significantly better prognosis than those with PVI in the control group (P=0.002). NAC-RT may be beneficial for patients with BR-PHC by inhibiting local invasion and metastasis as prognosis following resection could be equivalent to that of patients with conventional ductal adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.