Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423286›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Decision tree-based classifiers for lung cancer diagnosis and subtyping using TCGA miRNA expression data.

Masih Sherafatian, Fateme Arjmand

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masih SherafatianDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14115-111, Iran.
Fateme ArjmandDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan 45139-56184, Iran.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRZanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer has the world's highest cancer- associated mortality rate, making biomarker discovery for this cancer a pressing issue. Machine learning approaches to identify molecular biomarkers are not as prevalent as screening of potential biomarkers by differential expression analysis. However, several differentially expressed miRNAs involved in cancer have been identified using this approach. The availability of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) allows the use of machine-learning methods for the molecular profiling of tumors. The present study employed empirical negative control microRNAs (miRs) in lung cancer to normalize lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) datasets from TCGA to model decision trees in order to classify lung cancer status and subtype. The two primary classification models consisted of four miRNAs for lung cancer diagnosis and subtyping. hsa-miR-183 and hsa-miR-135b were used to distinguish lung tumors from normal samples taken from tissues adjacent to the tumor site, and hsa-miR-944 and hsa-miR-205 to further classify the tumors into LUAD and LUSC major subtypes. Specific cancer status classification models were also presented for each subtype.

Indexed as

diagnosislung cancermiRNA biomarkersubtypingThe Cancer Genome Atlas

Identifiers

PMID31423286
PMCPMC6607095
OpenAlexW2949766390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.