ArticleOncology letters2019
Maximum allele frequency observed in plasma: A potential indicator of liquid biopsy sensitivity.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of liquid-based to tissue-based biopsy analysis by targeted next generation sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Sintilimab with two cycles of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Hologenomic analysis of rectal mucus sampling for detection of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Efficacy of erlotinib in NSCLC harboring rare EGFR extracellular domain mutation (T263P) and common mutations: Case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized medicine is revolutionizing the diagnosis and treatment of cancer; however, for personalized medicine to be used accurately, patient information is essential to determine the appropriate diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. The detection of genomic mutations in liquid biopsy samples is a non-invasive method of characterizing the genotype of a tumor. However, next generation sequencing-based plasma genotyping only has a sensitivity of ~70%. Identifying potential indicators that may reflect the sensitivity of a liquid biopsy analysis could offer important information for its clinical application. In the present study, 47 pairs of patient-matched plasma and tumor tissue samples obtained from patients with advanced lung cancer were sequenced using a panel of 56 cancer-associated genes. The plasma maximum allele frequency (Max AF) was identified as a novel biomarker to indicate the sensitivity of plasma genotyping. Using the identified somatic mutations in patient tissue biopsy samples as a reference, the sensitivity of the corresponding patient plasma test was investigated. The by-variant sensitivity of the plasma test was 68.1%, with 79 matched and 37 missed genetic aberrances. The by-patient sensitivity was calculated as 83%. Patients with a high plasma Max AF value (>2.2%) demonstrated a higher concordance with the range of mutations identified in the patient-matched tissue samples. The Max AF observed in patient plasma samples was positively correlated with liquid biopsy sensitivity and could be used as a potential indicator of liquid biopsy sensitivity. Therefore, patients with a low plasma Max AF (≤2.2%) may need to undergo further tissue biopsy to allow personalized oncology treatment. In summary, the present study may offer a non-invasive testing method for a sub-group of patients with advanced lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.