Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423273›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Anti-EpCAM antibodies for detection of metastatic carcinoma in effusions and peritoneal wash.

Fabiana Pirani Carneiro, Maria Imaculada Muniz-Junqueira, Marcos De Vasconcelos Carneiro, Ísis De Araújo Oliveira, Aluízio Carlos Soares, Nathália De Vargas Haar, Gustavo Henrique Soares Takano, Leonora Maciel De Sousa Vianna, Guilherme De Carvalho Caldas, Danillo Leal Marinho Vieira and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From operating room to pathology report: Delphi consensus on pathological assessment of peritoneal cytology and biopsies in staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Detection of carcinoma in serous effusions: a review.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabiana Pirani CarneiroPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Maria Imaculada Muniz-JunqueiraPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Marcos De Vasconcelos CarneiroCatholic University of Brasilia, Brasília 71966-700, Brazil.
Ísis De Araújo OliveiraPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Aluízio Carlos SoaresPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Nathália De Vargas HaarPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Gustavo Henrique Soares TakanoPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Leonora Maciel De Sousa ViannaPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Guilherme De Carvalho CaldasPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Danillo Leal Marinho VieiraPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Lígia Lins FrutuosoPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Larissa Matos Rodrigues BritoPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Rafael Vieira Martins De SiqueiraPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Amanda Moreira ParentePathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Tercia Maria Mendes Lousa De CastroPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Isabela PeresPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Lianna Martha Soares MendesPathological Anatomy Center of University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília 70840-050, Brazil.
Tatiana Karla Dos Santos BorgesPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Vânia Moraes FerreiraPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Andrea Barretto MotoyamaPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Universidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) has been used as diagnostic/prognostic marker and therapeutic target. The aim of the present study was to compare immunoreactivity of antibodies against distinct epitopes in the ectodomain of EpCAM for detection of carcinoma from different primary sites and of different histological types in effusions and peritoneal wash. Two antibodies against epitopes in the EGF-like domain I (clones Moc-31 and Ber-EP4) and one antibody against the epitope in the cysteine-poor region (158210) of EpCAM were used (all commercially available). Independently of the clone used, EpCAM overexpression was observed in almost all samples when all the adenocarcinoma samples were analyzed together. By using Moc-31, EpCAM overexpression was observed in all samples of adenocarcinoma. Absence of EpCAM overexpression was observed in a few adenocarcinoma samples at some sites of tumor origin, including ovary, breast and stomach, when Ber-EP4 and 158210 were used. Regarding carcinomas aside from adenocarcinomas, histological types, such as squamous cell, urothelial and small cell carcinoma showed different degrees of EpCAM expression according to the antibody used. In squamous cell carcinoma, overexpression was observed only with the clone 158210. It was concluded that, overall, most samples of metastatic carcinoma from effusions showed overexpression of EpCAM. However, there are significant variations in its detection according to the primary site, histological type of the carcinoma and depending on the antibody used. Thus, the use of more than one type of anti-EpCAM antibody would increase the chance of its detection in metastatic carcinoma effusion.

Indexed as

cancercarcinomacytologyeffusionsepithelial cell adhesion moleculeimmunocytochemistry

Identifiers

PMID31423273
PMCPMC6607339
OpenAlexW2952600590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.