ArticleOncology letters2019
Identification of
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Missense mutations of GPER1 in breast invasive carcinoma: Exploring gene expression, signal transduction and immune cell infiltration with insights from cellular pharmacology.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Bioinformatics Study Identified EGF as a Crucial Gene in Papillary Renal Cell Cancer.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Modeling Neoplastic Growth in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Polycystic Kidney Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Identification and Analysis of Novel Biomarkers Involved in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma by Integrated Bioinformatics Analyses.BioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), the third most common histological subtype of RCC, comprises 5-7% of all RCC cases. The aim of the present study was to identify potential biomarkers for chRCC and to examine the underlying mechanisms. A total of 4 profile datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses of DEGs were performed with the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed to predict hub genes. Hub gene expression within chRCC across multiple datasets, as well as overall survival, were investigated by utilizing the Oncomine platform and UALCAN dataset, separately. A total of 266 DEGs (88 upregulated genes and 168 downregulated genes) were identified from 4 profile datasets. Integrating the results from the PPI network, Oncomine platform and survival analysis,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.