ArticleOncology letters2019
Efficacy of interventional therapy and effect on inflammatory factors in patients with gastric cancer after chemotherapy.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical effect of interventional therapy on gastric cancer after chemotherapy and effect on inflammatory factors in peripheral blood serum of patients were investigated. A retrospective analysis of 429 patients with gastric cancer treated in Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine from July 2008 to December 2014 was performed. Among them, 220 patients received interventional therapy after chemotherapy as the experimental group, and 209 patients received conventional therapy as the control group. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumor markers CA19-9, interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels were measured before and after chemotherapy. The correlation between the concentration of CEA and CA19-9 before and after treatment and the levels of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were analyzed in the experimental group, and all patients were followed up for 3 years. There were no significant differences in CEA, CA19-9, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 between the two groups before chemotherapy (P>0.05). After treatment, the concentrations of CEA, CA19-9, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group before and after treatment (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05). Pearson's correlation analysis showed that the concentrations of CEA and CA19-9 in the serum of the experimental group before and after treatment were positively correlated with the levels of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 (P<0.05). The 3-year overall survival rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that age, Borrmann classification, degree of differentiation, and history of Helicobacter pylori infection were independent prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer. Compared with traditional treatment, interventional therapy can greatly improve the recovery of gastric cancer patients after chemotherapy, reduce the occurrence of complications and inflammation, and improve the survival rate of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.