Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423227›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Predicting prognosis of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma on the basis of gene expression and clinical features using Random Forest.

Fufen Yin, Xingyang Shao, Lijun Zhao, Xiaoping Li, Jingyi Zhou, Yuan Cheng, Xiangjun He, Shu Lei, Jiangeng Li, Jianliu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fufen YinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xingyang ShaoCollege of Automation, Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, P.R. China.
Lijun ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xiaoping LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Jingyi ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Yuan ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xiangjun HeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Shu LeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Jiangeng LiCollege of Automation, Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, P.R. China.
Jianliu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional clinical features are not sufficient to accurately judge the prognosis of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA). Molecular biological characteristics and traditional clinical features are particularly important in the prognosis of EEA. The aim of the present study was to establish a predictive model that considers genes and clinical features for the prognosis of EEA. The clinical and RNA sequencing expression data of EEA were derived from samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Peking University People's Hospital (PKUPH; Beijing, China). Samples from TCGA were used as the training set, and samples from the PKUPH were used as the testing set. Variable selection using Random Forests (VSURF) was used to select the genes and clinical features on the basis of TCGA samples. The RF classification method was used to establish the prediction model. Kaplan-Meier curves were tested with the log-rank test. The results from this study demonstrated that on the basis of TCGA samples, 11 genes and the grade were selected as the input features. In the training set, the out-of-bag (OOB) error of RF model-1, which was established using the '11 genes', was 0.15; the OOB error of RF model-2, which was established using the 'grade', was 0.39; and the OOB error of RF model-3, established using the '11 genes and grade', was 0.15. In the testing set, the classification accuracy of RF model-1, model-2 and model-3 was 71.43, 66.67 and 80.95%, respectively. In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the VSURF was used to select features relevant to EEA prognosis, and an EEA predictive model combining genes and traditional features was established for the first time in the present study. The prediction accuracy of the RF model on the basis of the 11 genes and grade was markedly higher than that of the RF models established by either the 11 genes or grade alone.

Indexed as

endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomafeature selectionmodelprognosticRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID31423227
PMCPMC6607378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.