Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31423149›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2019

Perceived impacts as narrated by service users and providers on practice, policy and mental health system following the implementation of the mhGAP-IG using the TEAM model in a rural setting in Makueni County, Kenya: a qualitative approach.

Victoria N Mutiso, Christine W Musyimi, Tahilia J Rebello, Michael O Ogutu, Ruth Ruhara, Darius Nyamai, Kathleen M Pike, David M Ndetei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria N MutisoAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Mawensi Gardens, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christine W MusyimiAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Mawensi Gardens, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tahilia J Rebello2Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Michael O OgutuAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Mawensi Gardens, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ruth RuharaAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Mawensi Gardens, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.
Darius NyamaiAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Mawensi Gardens, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kathleen M Pike2Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University, New York, USA.
David M NdeteiAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Mawensi Gardens, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.
Africa Mental Health Foundation · KEColumbia University · USUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA team approach is key to reduction of the mental health treatment gap. It requires collaborative effort of all formal and informal community based service providers and the consumers of the services. Qualitative evaluations of such an approach add value to the quantitative evaluations.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted among 205 participants. These were grouped into a total of 19 focus group discussions for community health workers (CHW), traditional healers (TH), faith healers (FH) and patients. For nurses and clinical officers we held 10 key informant interviews and three key informant discussions. We aimed to document personal perceptions as expressed in narratives on mental health following a community based application of the WHO mental health treatment Gap-intervention guideline (mhGAP-IG) using the TEAM model. We also aimed to document how the narratives corroborated key findings on the quantitative wing of the TEAM model.

resultsThere were three categories of perceptions: (i) patient-related, (ii) health provider-related and, (iii) health system related. The patient related narratives were linked to improvement in their mental and physical health, increased mental health awareness, change in lifestyle and behavior, enhanced social functioning and an increase in family productivity. Health provider perceptions were related to job satisfaction, capacity building and increased interest in mental health training. Mental health system related narratives included effectiveness and efficiency in service delivery and increase in number of referrals at the primary health care facilities.

conclusionThe TEAM is a feasible model for the implementation of the mhGAP-IG. It led to positive perceptions and narratives by service provides and service consumers. The qualitative findings corroborated the quantitative findings of TEAM.

Indexed as

KenyaMental health systemmhGAP-IGNarrativesPerceptionsPolicyPracticeTEAM

Identifiers

PMID31423149
PMCPMC6693225
OpenAlexW2968093173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.