Evaluation of cowpea mini core accessions for resistance to flower bud thrips

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Eavesdropping the pivotal defensive representatives of plant-thrips interaction.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
   Review
2. Assessing the effectiveness of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam via root irrigation against Megalurothrips usitatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its residual effects on cowpea.Journal of economic entomology · 2023
   Article
3. Cowpea Constraints and Breeding in Europe.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
4. Evaluation of cowpea mini core accessions for resistance to flower bud thripsJournal of applied entomology = Zeitschrift fur angewandte Entomologie · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as