Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31422849›Full record

ArticleBehavior therapy2019

Marilyn L Piccirillo, Emorie D Beck, Thomas L Rodebaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Using the experience sampling method to support clinical practice: An illustration with problematic cannabis use.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marilyn L PiccirilloWashington University in St. Louis. Electronic address: piccirillom@wustl.edu.
Emorie D BeckWashington University in St. Louis.
Thomas L RodebaughWashington University in St. Louis.

Funding

Longitudinal Risk Factors For Depression and Development of Individual Risk ModelsF31MH115641 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PICCIRILLO, MARILYN · 2017 to 2018
$74k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH115641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theorists and clinicians have long noted the need for idiographic (i.e., individual-level) designs within clinical psychology. Results from idiographic work may provide a possible resolution of the therapist's dilemma-the problem of treating an individual using information gathered via group-level research. Due to advances in data collection and time series methodology, there has been increasing interest in using idiographic designs to answer clinical questions. Although time series methods have been well-studied outside the field of clinical psychology, there is limited direction on how clinicians can use such models to inform their clinical practice. In this primer, we collate decades of published and word-of-mouth information on idiographic designs, measurement, and modeling. We aim to provide an initial guide on the theoretical and practical considerations that we urge interested clinicians to consider before conducting idiographic work of their own.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysiciansResearch PersonnelHumansResearch Designidiographicsingle subjecttime-series methodologywithin-person methodology

Identifiers

PMID31422849
PMCPMC13247546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.