Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31422565›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2019

Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the in-vivo assessment of bone strength: state of the art-outcomes of an expert consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Adolfo Diez-Perez, Maria Luisa Brandi, Nasser Al-Daghri, Jaime C Branco, Olivier Bruyère, Loredana Cavalli, Cyrus Cooper, Bernard Cortet, Bess Dawson-Hughes, Hans Peter Dimai and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06460168 (Comparative Effects of Mulligan and Maitland Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Post Prp Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06460168 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Mulligan and Maitland Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Post Prp Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsMulligan(MWM) MobilizationTechnique, Maitland Mobilization technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative longitudinal assessment of bone mineral density measured with radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  10. Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) for the evaluation of bone health in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bone mineral density assessment using radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) in patients before and after total hip replacement.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 12 countries.

Adolfo Diez-PerezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar/IMIM and CIBERFES, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. ADiez@parcdesalutmar.cat.
Maria Luisa BrandiFirmoLab Fondazione F.I.R.M.O., Florence, Italy.
Nasser Al-Daghri *Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Jaime C Branco *NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Olivier Bruyère *WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Loredana Cavalli *FirmoLab Fondazione F.I.R.M.O., Florence, Italy.
Cyrus Cooper *MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Bernard Cortet *Department of Rheumatology and EA 4490, University-Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.
Bess Dawson-Hughes *Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Hans Peter Dimai *Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stefano Gonnelli *Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Peyman Hadji *Frankfurter Hormon und Osteoporose Zentrum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Philippe Halbout *International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland.
Jean-Marc Kaufman *Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Andreas Kurth *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Osteology, Klinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Medea Locquet *Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Stefania Maggi *National Research Council, Aging Program, Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy.
Radmila Matijevic *Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Jean-Yves Reginster *Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
René Rizzoli *Service of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Thomas Thierry *Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Nord, CHU St Etienne, St Etienne, France.
University of Liège · BEUniversity of Florence · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGhent University Hospital · BEKing Saud University · SAMedical University of Graz · ATNational Research Council · ITTufts University · USUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité Jean Monnet · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Novi Sad · RSUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this paper was to review the available approaches for bone strength assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk prediction, and to provide insights into radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry (REMS), a non-ionizing axial skeleton technique.

methodsA working group convened by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis met to review the current image-based methods for bone strength assessment and fracture risk estimation, and to discuss the clinical perspectives of REMS.

resultsAreal bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the consolidated indicator for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk assessment. A more reliable fracture risk estimation would actually require an improved assessment of bone strength, integrating also bone quality information. Several different approaches have been proposed, including additional DXA-based parameters, quantitative computed tomography, and quantitative ultrasound. Although each of them showed a somewhat improved clinical performance, none satisfied all the requirements for a widespread routine employment, which was typically hindered by unclear clinical usefulness, radiation doses, limited accessibility, or inapplicability to spine and hip, therefore leaving several clinical needs still unmet. REMS is a clinically available technology for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk assessment through the estimation of BMD on the axial skeleton reference sites. Its automatic processing of unfiltered ultrasound signals provides accurate BMD values in view of fracture risk assessment.

conclusionsNew approaches for improved bone strength and fracture risk estimations are needed for a better management of osteoporotic patients. In this context, REMS represents a valuable approach for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk prediction.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonBone and BonesBone DensityConsensusFemaleFractures, BoneHumansOsteoarthritisOsteoporosisRisk AssessmentSpectrum AnalysisUltrasonographyBone strength assessmentFemoral neckFracture riskLumbar spineOsteoporosis diagnosisREMSUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31422565
PMCPMC6763416
OpenAlexW2969105876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.