Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31422498›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Clinical impact of circulating oncogenic MiRNA-221 and MiRNA-222 in glioblastoma multiform.

Menha Swellam, Lobna Ezz El Arab, Amr S Al-Posttany, Samy B Said

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Liquid biomarkers in glioma.Brain tumor pathology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Metastatic Melanoma: Liquid Biopsy as a New Precision Medicine Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Menha SwellamGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. menhamswellam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-7194
Lobna Ezz El ArabClinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amr S Al-PosttanyChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta, Egypt.
Samy B SaidChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta, Egypt.
Damietta University · EGAin Shams University · EGNational Research Centre · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimGlioblastoma multiform (GBM); most fatal brain cancer, is incurable with molecular diversity hence identification of molecular targets that contribute to GBM tumorgenesis will be suitable for the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies. Micro-RNAs (miR); small RNA molecules, are stable in blood and play a crucial role in molecular processes in GBM. Thus it was aimed to investigate the clinical role of miR-221 and miR-222 among GBM cases as compared to healthy individuals and illustrate their role in patient's survival. MATERIALS AND

methodsBlood samples were withdrawn from 20 GBM cases before and after treatment, a group of 20 healthy individuals were served as control. For all enrolled samples expression of miR-221 and miR-222 were detected using quantitative PCR (QPCR). Sensitivities, specificities of investigated miRs and their relation with GBM clinical characteristics and patient's outcome were analyzed using Kaplan Meir curve.

resultsExpression of investigated miR- 221 and -222 were significantly increased in GBM cases as compared to healthy individuals (F = 12.9, at P < 0.001, F = 28.78, at P < 0.0001, respectively) and with absolute specificity for both and 90% sensitivity for miR-221 and 85% for miR-222. Among GBM patients (n = 20), mean expression level miR-221 reported significant increase with elder GBM ( > 60 years) at F = 5.7, P = 0.028, while both miR-221 and -222 showed significant difference in performance status (ECGO) at P = 0.036 and 0.007, patients with primary lesion at P = 0.001 and 0.005, surgically treatment strategy at P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. Patients were grouped according to their outcomes into response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]), stable disease[SD] and progressive disease [PD], miR-221 and miR-222 showed increase expression with PD and patients with worse PFS and OS were those with high miRs expression.

conclusionDetection of circulating miR-221 and miR-222 may be used as circulating molecular marker for diagnosis and prediction of outcome for patients with GBM. Further studies with large cohort of samples are encouraged.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIR221, humanMIR222, humanGlioblastoma multiformMiRNAPrognosisResponse

Identifiers

PMID31422498
OpenAlexW2966931392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.