ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019
Clinical impact of circulating oncogenic MiRNA-221 and MiRNA-222 in glioblastoma multiform.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Potential of Circulating miRNAs in Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Prognostic Role of MicroRNA 222 in Patients with Glioma: A Meta-analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Pooled it
- Blood Biomarkers of Glioma in Response Assessment Including Pseudoprogression and Other Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Liquid Biopsy in Primary CNS Tumors: Bridging Biology, Technology, and Clinical Care.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Cell-free and extracellular vesicle microRNAs with clinical utility for solid tumors.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy-Derived Tumor Biomarkers for Clinical Applications in Glioblastoma.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Monitoring Tool in Glioblastoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Circulating Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Advances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- Challenges and advances in glioblastoma targeted therapy: the promise of drug repurposing and biomarker exploration.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The potential of miRNA-based approaches in glioblastoma: An update in current advances and future perspectives.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Liquid biomarkers in glioma.Brain tumor pathology · 2023Review
- Cellular Conversations in Glioblastoma Progression, Diagnosis and Treatment.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Metastatic Melanoma: Liquid Biopsy as a New Precision Medicine Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2022Review
- Prognostic utility of lncRNAs (LINC00565 and LINC00641) as molecular markers in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGlioblastoma multiform (GBM); most fatal brain cancer, is incurable with molecular diversity hence identification of molecular targets that contribute to GBM tumorgenesis will be suitable for the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies. Micro-RNAs (miR); small RNA molecules, are stable in blood and play a crucial role in molecular processes in GBM. Thus it was aimed to investigate the clinical role of miR-221 and miR-222 among GBM cases as compared to healthy individuals and illustrate their role in patient's survival. MATERIALS AND
methodsBlood samples were withdrawn from 20 GBM cases before and after treatment, a group of 20 healthy individuals were served as control. For all enrolled samples expression of miR-221 and miR-222 were detected using quantitative PCR (QPCR). Sensitivities, specificities of investigated miRs and their relation with GBM clinical characteristics and patient's outcome were analyzed using Kaplan Meir curve.
resultsExpression of investigated miR- 221 and -222 were significantly increased in GBM cases as compared to healthy individuals (F = 12.9, at P < 0.001, F = 28.78, at P < 0.0001, respectively) and with absolute specificity for both and 90% sensitivity for miR-221 and 85% for miR-222. Among GBM patients (n = 20), mean expression level miR-221 reported significant increase with elder GBM ( > 60 years) at F = 5.7, P = 0.028, while both miR-221 and -222 showed significant difference in performance status (ECGO) at P = 0.036 and 0.007, patients with primary lesion at P = 0.001 and 0.005, surgically treatment strategy at P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. Patients were grouped according to their outcomes into response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]), stable disease[SD] and progressive disease [PD], miR-221 and miR-222 showed increase expression with PD and patients with worse PFS and OS were those with high miRs expression.
conclusionDetection of circulating miR-221 and miR-222 may be used as circulating molecular marker for diagnosis and prediction of outcome for patients with GBM. Further studies with large cohort of samples are encouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.