ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019
Ki-67 (30-9) scoring and differentiation of Luminal A- and Luminal B-like breast cancer subtypes.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic and predictive value of the luminal-like subtype in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: an analysis of the DATA trial.ESMO open · 2025Trial
- Preclinical study and phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy in luminal/HER2-low breast cancer: PILHLE-001 study.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Trial
- The purinergic signaling interfaces in breast cancer angiogenesis.Purinergic signalling · 2026Review
- Molecular targets and therapies associated with poor prognosis of triple‑negative breast cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Non-invasive prediction of DCE-MRI radiomics model on CCR5 in breast cancer based on a machine learning algorithm.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- Crosstalk between SUMOylation and other post-translational modifications in breast cancer.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024Review
- Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in Breast Cancer: Prognostic and Predictive Significance across Molecular Subtypes.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Exploring Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Hallmarks of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up in Clinical Practice.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Coordinated activation of c-Src and FOXM1 drives tumor cell proliferation and breast cancer progression.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- The Critical Impact of Sphingolipid Metabolism in Breast Cancer Progression and Drug Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- ERBB2 mutation is associated with sustained tumor cell proliferation after short-term preoperative endocrine therapy in early lobular breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022Article
- Breast cancer in the era of precision medicine.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- How to Perform Repeat Sentinel Node Biopsy Safely After a Previous Mastectomy: Technical Features and Oncologic Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- RNF6 promotes the migration and invasion of breast cancer by promoting the ubiquitination and degradation of MST1.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Luminal B-like Breast Cancer: Results of the Phase II GIADA Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Article
- Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes.The breast journal · 2022Article
- FDG positron emission tomography imaging and ctDNA detection as an early dynamic biomarker of everolimus efficacy in advanced luminal breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Review
- Recent Radiomics Advancements in Breast Cancer: Lessons and Pitfalls for the Next Future.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKi-67 labeling index assessed by immunohistochemical assays has been shown useful in assessing the risk of recurrence for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive HER2-negative breast cancers (BC) and distinguishing Luminal A-like from Luminal B-like tumors. We aimed to assess the performance of the Ventana CONFIRM anti-Ki-67 (30-9) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody.
methodsWe constructed a case-cohort design based on a random sample (n = 679) of all patients operated on for a first primary, non-metastatic, ER-positive, HER2-negative BC at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Milan, Italy during 1998-2002 and all additional patients (n = 303) operated during the same period, who developed an event (metastasis in distant organs or death due to BC as primary event) and were not included in the previous subset. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse subcohort sampling probability weighting was used to evaluate the risk of event according to Ki-67 (30-9) and derived intrinsic molecular subtype, using previously defined cutoff values, i.e., respectively 14% and 20%.
resultsKi-67 was < 14% in 318 patients (32.4%), comprised between 14 and 19% in 245 patients (24.9%) and ≥ 20 in 419 patients (42.7%). At multivariable analysis, the risk of developing distant disease was 1.88 (95% CI 1.20-2.93; P = 0.006) for those with Ki-67 comprised between 14 and 19%, and 3.06 (95% CI 1.93-4.84; P < 0.0001) for those with Ki-67 ≥ 20% compared to those with Ki-67 < 14%. Patients with Luminal B-like BC had an approximate twofold risk of developing distant disease (HR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.35-2.71; P = 0.0003) than patients with Luminal A-like BC defined using Ki-67 (30-9).
conclusionsKi-67 evaluation using the 30-9 rabbit monoclonal primary antibody was able to stratify patients with ER-positive HER2-negative BC into prognostically distinct groups. Ki-67 assessment, with strict adherence to the international recommendations, should be included among the clinically useful biological parameters for the best treatment of patients with BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.