Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31422490›Full record

Observational studyCancer causes & control : CCC2019

Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005-2013.

Lisa M Lines, Julia Cohen, Michael T Halpern, Ashley Wilder Smith, Erin E Kent

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa M LinesRTI International, 307 Waverley Oaks Rd, Suite 101, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA. llines@rti.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9202-3466
Julia CohenRTI International, 307 Waverley Oaks Rd, Suite 101, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA.
Michael T HalpernCancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Room 3E4342, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-6313
Ashley Wilder SmithCancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Room 3E4342, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
Erin E KentGillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27559, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2503-2191

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCI NIH HHS HHSN-261-2015-00132UNCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven the associations between poverty and poorer outcomes among older adults with cancer, we sought to understand the effects of dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid-as a marker of poverty-on self-reported care experiences among seniors diagnosed with cancer.

methodsRetrospective, observational study using cancer registry, Medicare claims, and care experience survey data (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CAHPS®]) for a national sample of fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees aged 65 or older. We included people with one incident primary, malignant cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2011, surveyed within 2 years after diagnosis (n = 9,800; 995 dual enrollees). Medicare CAHPS measures included 5 global ratings and 3 composite scores.

resultsAfter adjustment for potential confounders, people with cancer histories who were dually enrolled were significantly more likely to report better experiences than non-duals on 2 measures (Medicare/their health plan: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.87; prescription drug plan [PDP]: aOR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73).

conclusionsDual enrollees with cancer reported better experiences than Medicare-only enrollees in terms of their health plan (Medicare FFS or Medicare Advantage) and their PDP. Better ratings among dually enrolled beneficiaries suggest possible divergence between health outcomes and care experiences, warranting additional investigation.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareNeoplasmsRegistriesSelf ReportUnited StatesCancerDual eligibleMedicaidMedicarePatient experiencePoverty

Identifiers

PMID31422490
PMCPMC6786484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.