Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31422453›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2020

Progression of the functional deficit in a group of patients with bipolar disorder: a cluster analysis based on longitudinal data.

Ana López-Villarreal, Eva María Sánchez-Morla, Estela Jiménez-López, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Ana Isabel Aparicio, Jorge Mateo-Sotos, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez, Eduard Vieta, José Luis Santos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biomarkers of neuroprogression and late staging in bipolar disorder: A systematic review.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana López-VillarrealDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Virgen de La Luz CIBERSAM, Cuenca, Spain.
Eva María Sánchez-MorlaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain. emsmorla@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9438-2307
Estela Jiménez-LópezDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Virgen de La Luz CIBERSAM, Cuenca, Spain.
Vicente Martínez-VizcaínoHealth and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Ana Isabel AparicioDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Virgen de La Luz CIBERSAM, Cuenca, Spain.
Jorge Mateo-SotosNeurobiological Research Group, Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Roberto Rodriguez-JimenezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.
Eduard VietaDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
José Luis SantosDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Virgen de La Luz CIBERSAM, Cuenca, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/00359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to examine the trajectory of psychosocial functioning in a sample of euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BD) throughout a 5-year follow-up. Ninety-nine euthymic bipolar patients and 40 healthy controls (HC) were included. A neurocognitive assessment (17 neurocognitive measures grouped in 6 domains) was carried out at baseline. The split version of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF-F) and the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) were used to examine psychosocial functioning at baseline (T1), and after a 5-year follow-up (T2). The statistical analysis was performed through repeated measures ANOVA and hierarchical cluster analysis based on the GAF-F and the FAST scores at T1 and T2. Eighty-seven patients (87.9%) were evaluated at T2. The cluster analysis identified two groups of patients. The first group included 44 patients (50.6%) who did not show a progression of the functional impairment (BD-NPI). The second cluster, which included 43 patients (49.4%), was characterized by a progression of the functional impairment (BD-PI). The BD-PI had a higher number of relapses and a higher number of hospitalizations during the follow-up period, as well as worse neurocognitive functioning than the BD-NPI. The repeated measures ANOVA confirmed that the psychosocial performance of BD-NPI is stable while there was a progression of the functional deterioration in BD-PI. The trajectory of the psychosocial functioning of patients with BD is not homogeneous. Our results suggest that in at least one subset of patients with BD, which might account for half of the patients, the disease has a progressive course.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionPsychosocial FunctioningAdultBipolar DisorderCluster AnalysisCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsBipolar disorderCluster analysisFollow-upFunctional outcomeNeuroprogression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.