ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict motor-inhibitory performance.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence of bottom-up homeostatic modulation induced taVNS during emotional and Go/No-Go tasks.Experimental brain research · 2024Trial
- Has stopping stopped making sense? Disentangling the processes elicited by complex action cancellation paradigms.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Sex-related differences in fractionated reaction time are not related to corticospinal excitability and inhibition.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Changes in the cortical GABAergic inhibitory system with ageing and ageing-related neurodegenerative diseases.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Action inhibition in a sport-specific paradigm: examining the limits of action control in basketball.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Modulation of intracortical circuits in primary motor cortex during automatic action tendencies.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- When the heart inhibits the brain: Cardiac phases modulate short-interval intracortical inhibition.iScience · 2024Article
- GABA, Aging and Exercise: Functional and Intervention Considerations.Neuroscience insights · 2024Review
- Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict action control when facing emotional stimuli.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Dynamic targeting enables domain-general inhibitory control over action and thought by the prefrontal cortex.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Reduced motor cortex GABAMolecular psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies in which single- and paired-pulse TMS was applied during motor task performance have shed considerable light on the functional relevance of popular TMS-derived neurophysiological biomarkers such as short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). While it has become well established that corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition are modulated during the enactment and cancellation of actions, it has remained unclear as to whether interindividual differences in these neurophysiological markers were associated with an individual's actual ability to restrain and cancel actions. In this study, we found that individual differences in both SICI and LICI were positively associated with relevant performance metrics on the go/no-go task and stop-signal task. Specifically, we found that individuals with greater resting SICI and LICI were faster to respond on go trials of the go/no-go task and were also more accurate at inhibiting their manual responses on both go/no-go and stop-signal tasks. These results are in support of findings from our earlier study and also provide new evidence for a general relationship between individual differences in resting-state GABAergic intracortical inhibitory functioning and motor inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31422421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.