ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
A 5-Gene Prognostic Combination for Predicting Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Prognostic Gene Signature in Gastric Cancer Patients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Pooled it
- Construction of a prognostic model via WGCNA combined with the LASSO algorithm for stomach adenocarcinoma patients.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Molecular Typing of Gastric Cancer Based on Invasion-Related Genes and Prognosis-Related Features.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Identification of a Novel Prognostic Signature for Gastric Cancer Based on Multiple Level Integration and Global Network Optimization.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to identify a multigene prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer (GC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Random survival forest (RSF) was performed to screen survival-related genes and develop a multigene combination based on the cumulative hazard function of each GC patient in TCGA-STAD and GSE15459. Kaplan-Meier curve and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied to evaluate the prognostic performance of the 5-gene combination. C-index was used to compare the prognostic performance of the 5-gene combination and another 9-gene signature in GC. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted. RESULTS We obtained 19 survival-related genes through univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis in the training set, 5 of which were identified and were used to develop a 5-gene combination through RSF. Patients in the 5-gene combination low-risk group had better overall survival (OS) than those in the 5-gene combination high-risk group, and the 5-gene combination was demonstrated to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with GC. The 5-gene combination outperformed the 9-gene signature in predicting the OS of GC patients, and it might affect the prognosis of GC patients through E2F signaling, MYC signaling, and G2M checkpoint. CONCLUSIONS We introduce a 5-gene combination that can predict the survival of GC patients and might be an independent prognostic factor in GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.