Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31421906›Full record

ReviewTrends in cancer2019

Improving CNS Delivery to Brain Metastases by Blood-Tumor Barrier Disruption.

Samuel A Sprowls, Tasneem A Arsiwala, Jacob R Bumgarner, Neal Shah, Sundus S Lateef, Brooke N Kielkowski, Paul R Lockman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Tumor Microenvironment in Melanoma Brain Metastasis: A New Potential Target?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel A SprowlsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Tasneem A ArsiwalaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Jacob R BumgarnerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Neal ShahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Sundus S LateefDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Brooke N KielkowskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Paul R LockmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University HSC, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA. Electronic address: prlockman@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
WVU Flow Cytometry and Single Cell Core Facility (FCSCCF)P20GM121322 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Dominique Bollino · 2018 to 2026
$22.4M
Stroke and Alzheimers Disease Related DementiasT32AG052375 · NIA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Paul D Chantler, BERNARD G. SCHREURS · 2017 to 2026
$3.5M
Prevention and treatment of brain micrometastases of breast cancerR01CA166067 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI LOCKMAN, PAUL R · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166067NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052375NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121322NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases encompass nearly 80% of all intracranial tumors. A late stage diagnosis confers a poor prognosis, with patients typically surviving less than 2 years. Poor survival can be equated to limited effective treatment modalities. One reason for the failure rates is the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-tumor barrier (BTB) that limit the access of potentially effective chemotherapeutics to metastatic lesions. Strategies to overcome these barriers include new small molecule entities capable of crossing into the brain parenchyma, novel formulations of existing chemotherapies, and disruptive techniques. Here, we review BBB physiology and BTB pathophysiology. Additionally, we review the limitations of routinely practiced therapies and three current methods being explored for BBB/BTB disruption for improved delivery of chemotherapy to brain tumors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic TherapyAntineoplastic Agentsblood–brain barrierblood–tumor barrierdisruptionpermeability

Identifiers

PMID31421906
PMCPMC6703178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.