ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2019
Technology adoption on farms: Using Normalisation Process Theory to understand sheep farmers' attitudes and behaviours in relation to using precision technology in flock management.
Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy of a Cattle Behavior Sensor for Monitoring Sheep in Indoor and Pasture Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal animal health monitoring in extensive livestock production systems.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- How do pig veterinarians view technology-assisted data utilisation for pig health and welfare management? A qualitative study in Spain, the Netherlands, and Ireland.Porcine health management · 2024Article
- Data recording and use of data tools for pig health management: perspectives of stakeholders in pig farming.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Improving triplet lamb survival: management practices used by commercial farmers.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Precision Livestock Farming Research: A Global Scientometric Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Adoption of hand tractor technology in terrace farming: Evidence from the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH), Pakistan.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Social and ethical implications of data and technology use on farms: a qualitative study of Swedish dairy and pig farmers.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.Journal of animal science · 2022Review
- Extensive Sheep and Goat Production: The Role of Novel Technologies towards Sustainability and Animal Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Awareness and control methods of gastrointestinal parasites of merino sheep among farmers from different agro-ecological zones of Lesotho.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Quantifying the value of on-farm measurements to inform the selection of key performance indicators for livestock production systems.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Legal Complexities of Animal Welfare in Australia: Do On-Animal Sensors Offer a Future Option?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Article
- The Use of Computer Records: A Tool to Increase Productivity in Dairy Herds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence suggests that UK sheep farmers experience lower productivity and profit margins than other livestock sectors and that they do not necessarily know where they gain or lose income from their flocks. More efficient use of precision technology has been identified as a potential way of addressing this problem. The mandatory requirement for Electronic Identification (EID) tags to be placed on all sheep offers an opportunity for sheep farmers to adopt precision technologies to manage herd health and maximise production and profit. Although the charactistics of farmers that are associated with adoption or non adoption of technology have been identified little is known about the social processes, meanings and experiences that influence uptake. This paper is novel as it draws on data from 36 sheep farmers in the UK and applies Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to gain an understanding of the reasons they do or do not use EID related precision technology on their farms. The interviews were tape recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo. Although respondents acknowledged the potential value of precision technology to improve their farm businesses they appeared to have alternative beliefs that were counter productive. Their beliefs that using precision technology posed a threat to their role as a good stockman, that it could not replace the need for hands-on interaction with their animals and that it was costly and difficult to use created an implementation gap. The use of NPT as an evaluation framework provided a valuable tool for increasing the understanding of contextual characteristics that undermine the routine embedding of such technology by sheep farmers. The data suggests that normalisation of the use of precision technology amongst sheep farmers could potentially be increased if manufacturers/suppliers co-design and work with farmer's to ensure that the technology enables the farmer to be in control and operates as an aid to achieving high quality stockmanship rather than a mechanism for profit maximisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.