Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31421379›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2020

Defining the Burden of Emergency General Surgery in Transplant Patients: A Nationwide Examination.

Umar F Bhatti, Adil A Shah, Aaron M Williams, Maaz K Zuberi, Zoya Butt, Ben Biesterveld, Hasan B Alam, Kamran Idrees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Umar F BhattiDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: ufb@med.umich.edu.
Adil A ShahDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Howard University, District of Columbia, Washington.
Aaron M WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Maaz K ZuberiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Howard University, District of Columbia, Washington.
Zoya ButtChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ben BiesterveldDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Howard University, District of Columbia, Washington.
Hasan B AlamDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kamran IdreesDepartment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransplant patients are at the risk of serious sequelae from medical and surgical intervention. The incidence and burden of emergency general surgery (EGS) in transplant patients are scarcely known. This study aims to identify predictors of outcomes in transplant patients with EGS needs.

methodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2007-2011) was queried for adult patients (aged ≥16 y) who underwent abdominal visceral transplantation. These were further queried for a secondary diagnosis of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-defined EGS condition. Outcome measures included mortality, complications, length of stay, and cost of care. Propensity scores were used to match patients across baseline characteristics. Multivariate analysis was used to further adjust propensity score quintiles and hospital-level characteristics.

resultsA total of 35,573 transplant patients were identified. Of these, 30% (n = 10,676) developed an EGS condition. Most common EGS conditions were resuscitation (7.7%), intestinal obstruction (7.3%), biliary conditions (3.9%), and hernias (3.2%). Patients with public insurance, those in the highest income quartile, and those treated at larger hospitals had a lower likelihood of developing an EGS condition (P < 0.05). Patients with an EGS condition had a ninefold higher likelihood of mortality and a threefold higher likelihood of developing complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 9.21 [1.80-10.89] and 3.17 [3.02-3.34], respectively). Transplant patients after EGS had a longer risk-adjusted length of stay and cost of index hospitalization (Absolute difference [95% CI]: 12.70 [12.14-13.26] and $57,797 [55,415-60,179], respectively]).

conclusionsTransplant patients fare poorly after developing an EGS condition. The results of this study will help in identifying at-risk patients and determining outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency TreatmentFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSurgical Procedures, OperativeTransplant RecipientsUnited StatesBurdenEmergency surgeryOutcomesRisk factorsTransplant

Identifiers

PMID31421379
PMCPMC10182896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.