Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31421123›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes.

Yuko M Komesu, Darrell L Dinwiddie, Holly E Richter, Emily S Lukacz, Vivian W Sung, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Halina M Zyczynski, Beri Ridgeway, Rebecca G Rogers, Lily A Arya and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Urinary Microbiota and the Gut-Bladder Axis in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Yuko M KomesuObstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM. Electronic address: ykomesu@salud.unm.edu.
Darrell L DinwiddiePediatrics, Clinical Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM.
Holly E RichterObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Emily S LukaczDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Vivian W SungObstetrics & Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Nazema Y SiddiquiObstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Halina M ZyczynskiObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Beri RidgewayObstetrics & Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Rebecca G RogersObstetrics & Gynecology, Dell Medical School University of Texas Austin, Austin, TX.
Lily A AryaObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Donna MazloomdoostGynecologic Health and Disease Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
Josh LevySocial, Statistical & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Benjamin CarperSocial, Statistical & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Marie G GantzSocial, Statistical & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
RTI International · USUniversity of New Mexico · USBrown University · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USEunice Kennedy Shriver Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center Administrative Supplement: ODSS CDE FundingU24HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARIE G GANTZ · 2016 to 2026
$35.8M
Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarah B. Peskoe · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
Duke KURe ProgramK12DK100024 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Cindy Amundsen · 2013 to 2026
$8.4M
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2TR001448 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CANNON, JUDY LIN · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Site (UG1)UG1HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI Vivian W Sung · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (UG1)UG1HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heidi S Harvie · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Site Application: The San Diego PelvicFloor ConsortiumUG1HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EMILY S. LUKACZ, Shawn A Menefee · 2016 to 2026
$2.9M
Pittsburgh Pelvic Floor Research ProgramUG1HD069006 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2016 to 2021
$1.5M
University of Alabama at Birmingham: Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkUG1HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2016 to 2021
$1.4M
Epigenomics in insulin resistance associated overactive bladderK23DK110417 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SIDDIQUI, NAZEMA Y · 2017 to 2019
$567k
Effects of Aging and the Urinary Microbiome on Recurrent Urinary Tract InfectionsR03AG060082 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SIDDIQUI, NAZEMA Y · 2018 to 2019
$228k
Innovations in Treatments for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Southwestern PFDN siteUG1HD069025 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI KOMESU, YUKO MARGARET · 2016 to 2021
$109k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001448NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716NIA NIH HHS R03 AG060082NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069013NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069025NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100024NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK110417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the vaginal and urinary microbiomes have been increasingly well-characterized in health and disease, few have described the relationship between these neighboring environments. Elucidating this relationship has implications for understanding how manipulation of the vaginal microbiome may affect the urinary microbiome and treatment of common urinary conditions.

objectiveTo describe the relationship between urinary and vaginal microbiomes using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We hypothesized that the composition of the urinary and vaginal microbiomes would be significantly associated, with similarities in predominant taxa. STUDY

designThis multicenter study collected vaginal swabs and catheterized urine samples from 186 women with mixed urinary incontinence enrolled in a parent study and 84 similarly aged controls. Investigators decided a priori that if vaginal and/or urinary microbiomes differed between continent and incontinent women, the groups would be analyzed separately; if similar, samples from continent and incontinent women would be pooled and analyzed together. A central laboratory sequenced variable regions 1-3 (v1-3) and characterized bacteria to the genus level. Operational taxonomic unit abundance was described for paired vaginal and urine samples. Pearson's correlation characterized the relationship between individual operational taxonomic units of paired samples. Canonical correlation analysis evaluated the association between clinical variables (including mixed urinary incontinence and control status) and vaginal and urinary operational taxonomic units, using the Canonical correlation analysis function in the Vegan package (R version 3.5). Linear discriminant analysis effect size was used to find taxa that discriminated between vaginal and urinary samples.

resultsUrinary and vaginal samples were collected from 212 women (mean age 53±11 years) and results from 197 paired samples were available for analysis. As operational taxonomic units in mixed urinary incontinence and control samples were related in canonical correlation analysis and since taxa did not discriminate between mixed urinary incontinence or controls in either vagina or urine, mixed urinary incontinence and control samples were pooled for further analysis. Canonical correlation analysis of vaginal and urinary samples indicated that that 60 of the 100 most abundant operational taxonomic units in the samples largely overlapped. Lactobacillus was the most abundant genus in both urine and vagina (contributing on average 53% to an individual's urine sample and 64% to an individual's vaginal sample) (Pearson correlation r=0.53). Although less abundant than Lactobacillus, other bacteria with high Pearson correlation coefficients also commonly found in vagina and urine included: Gardnerella (r=0.70), Prevotella (r=0.64), and Ureaplasma (r=0.50). Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis identified Tepidimonas and Flavobacterium as bacteria that distinguished the urinary environment for both mixed urinary incontinence and controls as these bacteria were absent in the vagina (Tepidimonas effect size 2.38, P<.001, Flavobacterium effect size 2.15, P<.001). Although Lactobacillus was the most abundant bacteria in both urine and vagina, it was more abundant in the vagina (linear discriminant analysis effect size effect size 2.72, P<.001).

conclusionSignificant associations between vaginal and urinary microbiomes were demonstrated, with Lactobacillus being predominant in both urine and vagina. Abundance of other bacteria also correlated highly between the vagina and urine. This inter-relatedness has implications for studying manipulation of the urogenital microbiome in treating conditions such as urgency urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections.

Indexed as

AdultBurkholderialesCase-Control StudiesDiscriminant AnalysisEscherichiaEubacterialesFemaleFlavobacteriumGardnerellaHumansLactobacillusLinear ModelsMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPrevotellaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SLactobacillusmixed urinary incontinenceurinary microbiomeurologic conditionsvaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID31421123
PMCPMC6995424
OpenAlexW2968446013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.