ArticlePhysiological reports2019
Force depression following a stretch-shortening cycle depends on the amount of residual force enhancement established in the initial stretch phase.
Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Residual force enhancement in human skeletal muscles: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of sport and health science · 2022Pooled it
- Energy Cost of Force Production After a Stretch-Shortening Cycle in Skinned Muscle Fibers: Does Muscle Efficiency Increase?Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Force depression following a stretch-shortening cycle depends on the amount of residual force enhancement established in the initial stretch phase.Physiological reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies on residual force enhancement (rFE) and residual force depression (rFD) of the muscle-tendon unit (MTU) have typically been conducted independent of each other, with little information available on how stretch-induced rFE affects the shortening phase and the steady-state MTU isometric force at the end of stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs). We showed previously that when rFE is kept constant, but the force at the end of the stretch is varied by changing the stretch speed, the steady-state forces at the end of SSCs were the same. These results led to the hypothesis that the amount of rFE of the MTU established in the initial stretch phase of SSCs determines the steady-state force following the shortening phase of SSCs. This study was aimed at testing this hypothesis. Steady-state MTU isometric thumb adduction forces were measured for pure isometric contractions, following pure shortening contractions, following pure stretch contractions, and following SSCs with constant shortening speed and magnitude. However, two stretch magnitudes (30° and 10° thumb abduction) and stretch speeds (15°/sec and ~ 60°/sec, respectively) were chosen such that forces at the end of the stretch phase of the SSCs were the same, while rFE differed substantially. As hypothesized, the steady-state isometric MTU forces following SSCs were positively related to the stretch-magnitude dependent amount of rFE established in the stretch phase and were independent of the force reached at the end of the stretch phase in SSCs. Among many competing theories, these results can potentially be explained with the idea that there is a length-specific engagement of a passive structural element at the initial length of muscle activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.