Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420951›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019

Evaluating antibacterial and anticancer activity of crude extracts of bacterial endophytes from Crinum macowanii Baker bulbs.

Tendani E Sebola, Nkemdinma C Uche-Okereafor, Kudzanai I Tapfuma, Lukhanyo Mekuto, Ezekiel Green, Vuyo Mavumengwana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The potential of Paraburkholderia species to enhance crop growth.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Identification of Endophytic Bacteria inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tendani E SebolaDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5245-5670
Nkemdinma C Uche-OkereaforDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9133-0624
Kudzanai I TapfumaDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-6695
Lukhanyo MekutoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3069-4624
Ezekiel GreenDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-0724
Vuyo MavumengwanaDivision of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4672-6176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results from this study revealed that crude extracts isolated from bacterial endophytes obtained from Crinum macowanii bulbs showed activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, while Acinetobacter guillouiae crude extracts displayed anticancer activity. This study aimed to isolate and characterize bacterial endophytes and their crude extracts from C. macowanii bulbs. Endophytes were isolated using validated surface sterilization techniques, followed by phenotypic and genotypic profiles of the isolates. Crude extracts were extracted from the endophytes using ethyl acetate, while methanol:dichloromethane (1:1) was used to obtain crude extracts from the bulbs. Antibacterial activity of crude extract from each endophyte was investigated against selected pathogenic strains using the broth microdilution method, and anticancer activity against U87MG glioblastoma and A549 lung carcinoma cells was determined by the MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxy-phenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) assay. Acinetobacter guillouiae, Pseudomonas moraviensis, Pseudomonas sp., Rahnella aquatilis, Bacillus cereus, Novosphingobium sp., Raoultella ornithinolytica, and Burkholderia tropica were successfully isolated. The crude extracts from the majority of endophytes showed antibacterial activity, ranging from 0.125 to >16.00 mg/ml against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Acinetobacter guillouiae extracts showed a high bioactive potential against U87MG glioblastoma cell lines by reducing their growth by 50% at concentrations of 12.5, 6.25, and 3.13 µg/ml. Crude extracts isolated from C. macowanii bulbs showed potential for possible drug lead against common pathogenic bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBacteriaCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalComplex MixturesCrinumEndophytesHumansPhylogenyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsComplex Mixturesantibacterial activityanticancer activityCrinum macowanii bulbscrude extractsendophytes

Identifiers

PMID31420951
PMCPMC6925154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.